Radeon HD 8770M vs Quadro K2000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
K1 K100 K120Q K140Q K160Q K340 NVS 510 Quadro 410 Quadro K420 Quadro K600 Quadro K2000 Quadro K2000D
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
HD 8530M HD 8730A HD 8730M HD 8750A HD 8750M HD 8770M HD 8790M R5 M240 Rebrand

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro K2000 with Radeon HD 8770M, including specs and performance data.

Quadro K2000
2013, $599
2 GB GDDR5, 51 Watt
3.78
+37.5%

K2000 outperforms HD 8770M by a substantial 37% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
Quadro K2000 Quadro K2000
HD 8770M HD 8770M

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking754841
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.18no data
Power efficiency5.69no data
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code nameGK107Mars
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date1 March 2013 (12 years ago)1 April 2013 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$599 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384384
Core clock speed954 MHz775 MHz
Boost clock speedno data825 MHz
Number of transistors1,270 million950 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)51 Wattno data
Texture fill rate30.5319.80
Floating-point processing power0.7327 TFLOPS0.6336 TFLOPS
ROPs168
TMUs3224
L1 Cache32 KB96 KB
L2 Cache256 KB256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x8
Length202 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GB2 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz1125 MHz
Memory bandwidth64 GB/s72 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 2x DisplayPortNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (11_1)
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan+1.2.131
CUDA3.0-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD70−75
+29.6%
54
−29.6%

Cost per frame, $

1080p8.56no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Far Cry 5 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Fortnite 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Valorant 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Dota 2 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Far Cry 5 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Fortnite 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Metro Exodus 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Valorant 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Dota 2 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Far Cry 5 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Valorant 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Metro Exodus 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Valorant 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Far Cry 5 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

4K
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dota 2 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Far Cry 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

This is how Quadro K2000 and HD 8770M compete in popular games:

  • Quadro K2000 is 30% faster in 1080p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 56 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 3.78 2.75
Recency 1 March 2013 1 April 2013

Quadro K2000 has a 37.5% higher aggregate performance score.

HD 8770M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 month.

The Quadro K2000 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 8770M in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro K2000 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon HD 8770M is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Quadro K2000
Quadro K2000
AMD Radeon HD 8770M
Radeon HD 8770M
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Quadro K2000 Quadro K2000
vs
K2000D Quadro K2000D
HD 8770M Radeon HD 8770M
vs
RX Vega 3 Radeon RX Vega 3
Quadro K2000 Quadro K2000
vs
Quadro P400 Quadro P400
NVS 315 NVS 315
vs
RTX 3050 Max-Q Refresh 6 GB RTX 3050 Max-Q Refresh 6 GB
NVS 315 NVS 315
vs
RTX 3050 Mobile Refresh 4 GB RTX 3050 Mobile Refresh 4 GB
Quadro K2000 Quadro K2000
vs
HD 8870M HD 8870M
Quadro K2000 Quadro K2000
vs
HD 8850M HD 8850M
Quadro K2000 Quadro K2000
vs
Quadro M600M Quadro M600M
Quadro K2000 Quadro K2000
vs
HD 8650M HD 8650M
Quadro K2000 Quadro K2000
vs
HD 8550G HD 8550G
Quadro K2000 Quadro K2000
vs
HD 8350G HD 8350G
Quadro K2000 Quadro K2000
vs
HD 8250 HD 8250
Quadro K2000 Quadro K2000
vs
HD 8180 HD 8180

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.5 257 votes

Rate Quadro K2000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 3 votes

Rate Radeon HD 8770M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro K2000 or Radeon HD 8770M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.