Go ad-free: support us on Patreon
and

HD Graphics 4200 vs Quadro K2000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
GRID K1 GRID K100 GRID K140Q GRID K160Q GRID K180Q NVS 510 NVS 1000 410 K420 K600 K2000 K2000D
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
4000 4200 4400 4600

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro K2000 with HD Graphics 4200, including specs and performance data.

Quadro K2000
2013
2 GB GDDR5, 51 Watt
3.91
+316%

K2000 outperforms HD Graphics 4200 by a whopping 316% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
Quadro K2000 Quadro K2000
HD Graphics 4200 HD Graphics 4200

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking7341153
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.44no data
Power efficiency5.5416.98
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Generation 7.5 (2013)
GPU code nameGK107Haswell GT2
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date1 March 2013 (12 years ago)2 September 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$599 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384160
Core clock speed954 MHz200 MHz
Boost clock speedno data850 MHz
Number of transistors1,270 million392 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm22 nm
Power consumption (TDP)51 Watt4 Watt
Texture fill rate30.5317.00
Floating-point processing power0.7327 TFLOPS0.272 TFLOPS
ROPs162
TMUs3220

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16Ring Bus
Length202 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount2 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1000 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth64 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 2x DisplayPortPortable Device Dependent

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (11_1)
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.64.3
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan++
CUDA3.0-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD30−35
+275%
8
−275%

Cost per frame, $

1080p19.97no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Dead Island 2 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Dead Island 2 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Far Cry 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Fortnite 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Valorant 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 13
+0%
13
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Dead Island 2 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Dota 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Far Cry 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Fortnite 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Metro Exodus 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Valorant 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Dead Island 2 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Dota 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Far Cry 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Valorant 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 0−1 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Dead Island 2 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

4K
High Preset

Dead Island 2 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Valorant 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Dead Island 2 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

This is how Quadro K2000 and HD Graphics 4200 compete in popular games:

  • Quadro K2000 is 275% faster in 1080p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 42 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 3.91 0.94
Recency 1 March 2013 2 September 2013
Chip lithography 28 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 51 Watt 4 Watt

Quadro K2000 has a 316% higher aggregate performance score.

HD Graphics 4200, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 months, a 27.3% more advanced lithography process, and 1175% lower power consumption.

The Quadro K2000 is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics 4200 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro K2000 is a workstation card while HD Graphics 4200 is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Quadro K2000
Quadro K2000
Intel HD Graphics 4200
HD Graphics 4200
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Quadro K2000 Quadro K2000
vs
K2000D Quadro K2000D
HD Graphics 4200 HD Graphics 4200
vs
9800M GT GeForce 9800M GT
Quadro K2000 Quadro K2000
vs
FirePro W4100 FirePro W4100
RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh NVIDIA RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh
vs
Quadro K5200 K5200
Arc 5 A550M Intel 5 A550M
vs
Quadro K5200 K5200
M6000 24 GB NVIDIA M6000 24 GB
vs
Quadro K620 K620
W6170M FirePro W6170M
vs
Tesla K40c K40c
Quadro K610M Quadro K610M
vs
Quadro K2000 K2000
HD Graphics P4000 HD Graphics P4000
vs
Quadro K2000 K2000
GTX 950M NVIDIA GTX 950M
vs
Quadro K4000 K4000
Quadro 410 Quadro 410
vs
Quadro K4000 K4000
GTX 1660 Mobile NVIDIA GTX 1660 Mobile
vs
Tesla C2050 C2050
RTX 4070 NVIDIA RTX 4070
vs
Tesla M2070-Q Q

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.5 252 votes

Rate Quadro K2000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 42 votes

Rate HD Graphics 4200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro K2000 or HD Graphics 4200, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.