Radeon RX 7800 XT vs Quadro K1200

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
GRID M3-3020 GRID M10-8Q GRID M40 NVS 810 K620 K1200 K2200 Tesla M10
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
7400 7600 7600 XT 7650 GRE 7700 XT 7800 XT 7900 GRE 7900 XT 7900 XTX

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro K1200 with Radeon RX 7800 XT, including specs and performance data.

Quadro K1200
2015, $322
4 GB 128-bit, 45 Watt
7.11
RX 7800 XT
2023, $499
16 GB GDDR6, 263 Watt
58.73
+726%

7800 XT outperforms K1200 by a whopping 726% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
Quadro K1200 Quadro K1200
RX 7800 XT RX 7800 XT

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking60045
Place by popularitynot in top-10084
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.1869.76
Power efficiency12.2017.24
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2017)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026)
GPU code nameGM107Navi 32
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date28 January 2015 (11 years ago)25 August 2023 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$321.97 $499

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

RX 7800 XT has 5812% better value for money than Quadro K1200.

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5123840
Core clock speed954 MHz1295 MHz
Boost clock speed1033 MHz2430 MHz
Number of transistors1,870 million28,100 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt263 Watt
Texture fill rate33.06583.2
Floating-point processing power1.0578 TFLOPS37.32 TFLOPS
ROPs1696
TMUs32240
Ray Tracing Coresno data60
L0 Cacheno data960 KB
L1 Cache256 KB768 KB
L2 Cache2 MB4 MB
L3 Cacheno data64 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length160 mm267 mm
Width1" (2.5 cm)2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type128 BitGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB16 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1253 MHz2438 MHz
Memory bandwidthUp to 80 GB/s624.1 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors4x mini-DisplayPort 1.21x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.1
Number of simultaneous displays4no data
HDMI-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Vision Pro+no data
Mosaic+no data
nView Desktop Management+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1212 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.7 (5.1)6.7
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL3.02.2
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA5.0-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Quadro K1200 7.11
RX 7800 XT 58.73
+726%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro K1200 2957
Samples: 776
RX 7800 XT 24414
+726%
Samples: 10857

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD24−27
−792%
214
+792%
1440p14−16
−779%
123
+779%
4K8−9
−800%
72
+800%

Cost per frame, $

1080p13.42
−475%
2.33
+475%
1440p23.00
−467%
4.06
+467%
4K40.25
−481%
6.93
+481%
  • RX 7800 XT has 475% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • RX 7800 XT has 467% lower cost per frame in 1440p
  • RX 7800 XT has 481% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 351
+0%
351
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 248
+0%
248
+0%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 272
+0%
272
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 355
+0%
355
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 196
+0%
196
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Far Cry 5 204
+0%
204
+0%
Fortnite 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 278
+0%
278
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 283
+0%
283
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 163
+0%
163
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Far Cry 5 196
+0%
196
+0%
Fortnite 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 261
+0%
261
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 178
+0%
178
+0%
Metro Exodus 172
+0%
172
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 366
+0%
366
+0%
Valorant 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 150
+0%
150
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Far Cry 5 182
+0%
182
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 222
+0%
222
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 200
+0%
200
+0%
Valorant 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 175
+0%
175
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 400−450
+0%
400−450
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 140
+0%
140
+0%
Metro Exodus 106
+0%
106
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 350−400
+0%
350−400
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 99
+0%
99
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Far Cry 5 176
+0%
176
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 202
+0%
202
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 147
+0%
147
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 42
+0%
42
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 152
+0%
152
+0%
Metro Exodus 63
+0%
63
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 118
+0%
118
+0%
Valorant 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 45
+0%
45
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Far Cry 5 104
+0%
104
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 164
+0%
164
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%

This is how Quadro K1200 and RX 7800 XT compete in popular games:

  • RX 7800 XT is 792% faster in 1080p
  • RX 7800 XT is 779% faster in 1440p
  • RX 7800 XT is 800% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 60 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 7.11 58.73
Recency 28 January 2015 25 August 2023
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 263 Watt

Quadro K1200 has 484% lower power consumption.

RX 7800 XT, on the other hand, has a 726% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 460% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 7800 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro K1200 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro K1200 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon RX 7800 XT is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Quadro K1200 Quadro K1200
vs
GRID M3-3020 GRID M3-3020
RX 7800 XT Radeon RX 7800 XT
vs
RX 9070 GRE Radeon RX 9070 GRE
Quadro K1200 Quadro K1200
vs
FirePro W5000 FirePro W5000
Quadro M4000 Quadro M4000
vs
FX 580 FX 580
Quadro M4000 Quadro M4000
vs
RX 9070 RX 9070
Quadro K1200 Quadro K1200
vs
NVS 300 NVS 300
Quadro K1200 Quadro K1200
vs
K2200M Quadro K2200M
Quadro K1200 Quadro K1200
vs
GT 1010 GT 1010
Tesla K80m Tesla K80m
vs
RTX 5060 Ti 16 GB RTX 5060 Ti 16 GB
Quadro K5200 Quadro K5200
vs
Quadro P400 Quadro P400
Tesla K40c Tesla K40c
vs
Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB
Quadro K6000 Quadro K6000
vs
GT 630M GT 630M
NVS 315 NVS 315
vs
RTX 3060 RTX 3060

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.9 138 votes

Rate Quadro K1200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 5340 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7800 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro K1200 or Radeon RX 7800 XT, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.