HD Graphics 2000 vs Quadro K1200

Place in the ranking	557	1251
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	2.86	no data
Power efficiency	11.60	no data
Architecture	Maxwell (2014−2017)	Generation 6.0 (2011)
GPU code name	GM107	Sandy Bridge GT1
Market segment	Workstation	Laptop
Release date	28 January 2015 (10 years ago)	1 February 2011 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$321.97	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	512	48
Core clock speed	1058 MHz	850 MHz
Boost clock speed	1124 MHz	1350 MHz
Number of transistors	1,870 million	189 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	32 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	45 Watt	unknown
Texture fill rate	35.97	8.100
Floating-point processing power	1.151 TFLOPS	0.1296 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	1
TMUs	32	6

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 1.0 x16
Length	160 mm	no data
Width	1" (2.5 cm)	no data
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	128 Bit	System Shared
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	System Shared
Memory bus width	128 Bit	System Shared
Memory clock speed	1250 MHz	System Shared
Memory bandwidth	Up to 80 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	no data	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	4x mini-DisplayPort	No outputs
Number of simultaneous displays	4	no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Vision Pro	+	no data
Mosaic	+	no data
nView Desktop Management	+	no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12	11.1 (10_1)
Shader Model	5.1	4.1
OpenGL	4.5	3.1
OpenCL	1.2	N/A
Vulkan	1.1.126	N/A
CUDA	5.0	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Quadro K1200 7.00
+1273%

HD Graphics 2000 0.51

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro K1200 2950
+1285%

HD Graphics 2000 213

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

150−160
+1264%

−1264%

Cost per frame, $

1080p

2.15

no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Hogwarts Legacy	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%
Hogwarts Legacy	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%
Valorant	27−30 +0%	27−30 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Dota 2	10−12 +0%	10−12 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%
Hogwarts Legacy	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%
Metro Exodus	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%
Valorant	27−30 +0%	27−30 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Dota 2	10−12 +0%	10−12 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%
Hogwarts Legacy	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%
Valorant	27−30 +0%	27−30 +0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	0−1	0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Hogwarts Legacy	0−1	0−1

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite

1−2

+0%

1−2

+0%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
Valorant	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS

2−3

+0%

2−3

+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite

2−3

+0%

2−3

+0%

This is how Quadro K1200 and HD Graphics 2000 compete in popular games:

Quadro K1200 is 1264% faster in 1080p

All in all, in popular games:

there's a draw in 31 test (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	7.00	0.51
Recency	28 January 2015	1 February 2011
Chip lithography	28 nm	32 nm

Quadro K1200 has a 1272.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, and a 14.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Quadro K1200 is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics 2000 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro K1200 is a workstation card while HD Graphics 2000 is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

Quadro K1200

HD Graphics 2000

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Sony Playstation 2 GPU 65nm

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4.1 104 votes

Rate Quadro K1200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

2.7 1393 votes

Rate HD Graphics 2000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro K1200 or HD Graphics 2000, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.