Radeon HD 6740G2 vs Quadro K1100M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro K1100M with Radeon HD 6740G2, including specs and performance data.

K1100M
2013
2 GB GDDR5, 45 Watt
2.46
+65.1%

K1100M outperforms HD 6740G2 by an impressive 65% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking851989
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.43no data
Power efficiency4.42no data
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Terascale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameGK107no data
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date23 July 2013 (12 years ago)14 June 2011 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$109.94 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384880
Core clock speed706 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,270 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)45 Wattno data
Texture fill rate22.59no data
Floating-point processing power0.5422 TFLOPSno data
ROPs16no data
TMUs32no data
L1 Cache32 KBno data
L2 Cache256 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedmedium sized
InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5no data
Maximum RAM amount2 GBno data
Memory bus width128 Bitno data
Memory clock speed700 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth44.8 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data
Display Port1.2no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-
3D Vision Pro+no data
Mosaic+no data
nView Display Management+no data
Optimus+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1211
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.5no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan+-
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

K1100M 2.46
+65.1%
HD 6740G2 1.49

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

K1100M 1827
+14.4%
HD 6740G2 1597

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

K1100M 8992
+76.7%
HD 6740G2 5088

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD18
+80%
10−12
−80%

Cost per frame, $

1080p6.11no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Hogwarts Legacy 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Far Cry 5 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%
Fortnite 12−14
+117%
6−7
−117%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+44.4%
9−10
−44.4%
Forza Horizon 5 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%
Hogwarts Legacy 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+30%
10−11
−30%
Valorant 40−45
+22.2%
35−40
−22.2%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 50−55
+50%
30−35
−50%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Dota 2 24−27
+36.8%
18−20
−36.8%
Far Cry 5 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%
Fortnite 12−14
+117%
6−7
−117%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+44.4%
9−10
−44.4%
Forza Horizon 5 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%
Grand Theft Auto V 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%
Hogwarts Legacy 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
Metro Exodus 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+30%
10−11
−30%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7
+0%
7−8
+0%
Valorant 40−45
+22.2%
35−40
−22.2%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Dota 2 24−27
+36.8%
18−20
−36.8%
Far Cry 5 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+44.4%
9−10
−44.4%
Hogwarts Legacy 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+30%
10−11
−30%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4
−75%
7−8
+75%
Valorant 40−45
+22.2%
35−40
−22.2%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 12−14
+117%
6−7
−117%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 18−20
+72.7%
10−12
−72.7%
Grand Theft Auto V 1−2 0−1
Metro Exodus 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
+53.3%
14−16
−53.3%
Valorant 21−24
+156%
9−10
−156%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Far Cry 5 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
Hogwarts Legacy 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+6.7%
14−16
−6.7%
Valorant 12−14
+62.5%
8−9
−62.5%

4K
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dota 2 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%
Far Cry 5 1−2 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

This is how K1100M and HD 6740G2 compete in popular games:

  • K1100M is 80% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Counter-Strike 2, with 1080p resolution and the Low Preset, the K1100M is 700% faster.
  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the HD 6740G2 is 75% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • K1100M performs better in 50 tests (94%)
  • HD 6740G2 performs better in 1 test (2%)
  • there's a draw in 2 tests (4%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.46 1.49
Recency 23 July 2013 14 June 2011
Chip lithography 28 nm 40 nm

K1100M has a 65.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

The Quadro K1100M is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 6740G2 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro K1100M is a mobile workstation graphics card while Radeon HD 6740G2 is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro K1100M
Quadro K1100M
AMD Radeon HD 6740G2
Radeon HD 6740G2

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 254 votes

Rate Quadro K1100M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon HD 6740G2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro K1100M or Radeon HD 6740G2, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.