RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell vs Quadro K1100M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro K1100M with RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell, including specs and performance data.

K1100M
2013
2 GB GDDR5, 45 Watt
2.46

RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell outperforms K1100M by a whopping 3965% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking8461
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.44no data
Power efficiency4.4026.82
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Blackwell 2.0 (2025)
GPU code nameGK107GB202
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release date23 July 2013 (12 years ago)18 March 2025 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$109.94 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores38414080
Core clock speed706 MHz1590 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2617 MHz
Number of transistors1,270 million92,200 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rate22.591,151
Floating-point processing power0.5422 TFLOPS73.69 TFLOPS
ROPs16176
TMUs32440
Tensor Coresno data440
Ray Tracing Coresno data110
L1 Cache32 KBno data
L2 Cache256 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)PCIe 5.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR7
Maximum RAM amount2 GB48 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed700 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth44.8 GB/s1.34 TB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x DisplayPort 2.1b
Display Port1.2no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-
3D Vision Pro+no data
Mosaic+no data
nView Display Management+no data
Optimus+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1212 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.8
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan+1.4
CUDA+12.0
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

K1100M 2.46
RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell 100.00
+3965%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

K1100M Samples: 1632 1088
RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Samples: 1 45357
+4069%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD18
−3789%
700−750
+3789%

Cost per frame, $

1080p6.11no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 8−9
−3650%
300−310
+3650%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−3900%
200−210
+3900%
Hogwarts Legacy 8−9
−3650%
300−310
+3650%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 9−10
−3789%
350−400
+3789%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
−3650%
300−310
+3650%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−3900%
200−210
+3900%
Far Cry 5 7−8
−3900%
280−290
+3900%
Fortnite 12−14
−3746%
500−550
+3746%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−3746%
500−550
+3746%
Forza Horizon 5 6−7
−3900%
240−250
+3900%
Hogwarts Legacy 8−9
−3650%
300−310
+3650%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
−3746%
500−550
+3746%
Valorant 40−45
−3877%
1750−1800
+3877%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 9−10
−3789%
350−400
+3789%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
−3650%
300−310
+3650%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 50−55
−3900%
2000−2050
+3900%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−3900%
200−210
+3900%
Dota 2 24−27
−3938%
1050−1100
+3938%
Far Cry 5 7−8
−3900%
280−290
+3900%
Fortnite 12−14
−3746%
500−550
+3746%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−3746%
500−550
+3746%
Forza Horizon 5 6−7
−3900%
240−250
+3900%
Grand Theft Auto V 7−8
−3900%
280−290
+3900%
Hogwarts Legacy 8−9
−3650%
300−310
+3650%
Metro Exodus 5−6
−3900%
200−210
+3900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
−3746%
500−550
+3746%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7
−3900%
280−290
+3900%
Valorant 40−45
−3877%
1750−1800
+3877%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 9−10
−3789%
350−400
+3789%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−3900%
200−210
+3900%
Dota 2 24−27
−3938%
1050−1100
+3938%
Far Cry 5 7−8
−3900%
280−290
+3900%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−3746%
500−550
+3746%
Hogwarts Legacy 8−9
−3650%
300−310
+3650%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
−3746%
500−550
+3746%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4
−3900%
160−170
+3900%
Valorant 40−45
−3877%
1750−1800
+3877%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 12−14
−3746%
500−550
+3746%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 6−7
−3900%
240−250
+3900%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 18−20
−3847%
750−800
+3847%
Grand Theft Auto V 2−3
−3900%
80−85
+3900%
Metro Exodus 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
−3813%
900−950
+3813%
Valorant 21−24
−3813%
900−950
+3813%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−3900%
80−85
+3900%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−3900%
160−170
+3900%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−3900%
240−250
+3900%
Hogwarts Legacy 3−4
−3900%
120−130
+3900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
−3900%
120−130
+3900%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 5−6
−3900%
200−210
+3900%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
−3963%
650−700
+3963%
Valorant 12−14
−3746%
500−550
+3746%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dota 2 7−8
−3900%
280−290
+3900%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−3900%
40−45
+3900%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−3900%
80−85
+3900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
−3900%
120−130
+3900%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 3−4
−3900%
120−130
+3900%

This is how K1100M and RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell compete in popular games:

  • RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell is 3789% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.46 100.00
Recency 23 July 2013 18 March 2025
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 48 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 300 Watt

K1100M has 566.7% lower power consumption.

RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell, on the other hand, has a 3965% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, a 2300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 460% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro K1100M in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro K1100M is a mobile workstation graphics card while RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro K1100M
Quadro K1100M
NVIDIA RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell
RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 252 votes

Rate Quadro K1100M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 42 votes

Rate RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro K1100M or RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.