NVIDIA Quadro K1100M vs K2000M
Comparison of Quadro K1100M and Quadro K2000M architecture, market type and release date.
Quadro K1100M and Quadro K2000M's general performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core clock, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of Quadro K1100M and Quadro K2000M's performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider its benchmark and gaming test results.
Core clock speed
Manufacturing process technology
Power consumption (TDP)
Texture fill rate
22.59 GTexel / s
23.84 GTexel / s
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Information on Quadro K1100M and Quadro K2000M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
Parameters of memory installed on Quadro K1100M and Quadro K2000M: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors don't have dedicated memory and use a shared part of system RAM.
Maximum RAM amount
Memory bus width
Memory clock speed
44.8 GB / s
28.8 GB / s
Video outputs and ports
Types and number of video connectors present on Quadro K1100M and Quadro K2000M.
Technological solutions and APIs supported by Quadro K1100M and Quadro K2000M. You'll probably need this information if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
3D Vision Pro
nView Display Management
APIs supported by Quadro K1100M and Quadro K2000M, sometimes including their particular versions.
DirectX 11, Shader 5.0
Non-gaming benchmarks performance of Quadro K1100M and Quadro K2000M. Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.
Overall benchmark performance
K2000M 1.39 +33.7%
3DMark Cloud Gate GPU
K1100M 9228 +5.3%
3DMark Fire Strike Score
K1100M 1299 +24.9%
3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
K1100M 1341 +28.2%
3DMark 11 Performance GPU
K1100M 1827 +1.6%
3DMark Vantage Performance
K1100M 8992 +13.1%
Unigine Heaven 3.0
K1100M 18 +5.9%
K2000M 1081 +3.5%
Octane Render OctaneBench
Rendering quality tests
GFXBench render quality
GFXBench high precision render quality
Cryptocurrency mining performance of Quadro K1100M and Quadro K2000M. Usually measured in megahashes per second.
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
18 Mh/s +0%
18 Mh/s +0%
Let's see how good Quadro K1100M and Quadro K2000M are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro K1100M
Much newer (23 July 2013 vs 1 June 2012)
Cheaper ($109.94 vs $265.27)
Higher memory bandwidth (44.8 vs 28.8 GB/s)
Less power hungry (45 vs 55 watts)
OpenCL 1.2 (Open Computing Language - an API for GPU usage in arbitrary calculations, e.g. for physics simulation)
Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro K2000M
33.7% faster in synthetic tests
So, Quadro K1100M or K2000M?
Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, Technical City recommends NVIDIA Quadro K2000M.
Should you still have questions on choice between Quadro K1100M and Quadro K2000M, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.