Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs vs Quadro GV100

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Quadro GV100 Tesla V100 PCIe Tesla V100 PCIe 16 GB Tesla V100 PCIe 32 GB Tesla V100 SXM2 Tesla V100S PCIe 32 GB
VS
Iris Xe Graphics G7 Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro GV100 with Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, including specs and performance data.

Quadro GV100
2018
32 GB HBM2, 250 Watt
51.46
+443%

GV100 outperforms Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs by a whopping 443% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Quadro GV100 Quadro GV100
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking52466
Place by popularitynot in top-10086
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.65no data
Power efficiency14.1123.18
ArchitectureVolta (2017−2020)Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)
GPU code nameGV100Tiger Lake Xe
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date27 March 2018 (6 years ago)15 August 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$8,999 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores512096
Core clock speed1132 MHz400 MHz
Boost clock speed1627 MHz1350 MHz
Number of transistors21,100 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology12 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt28 Watt
Texture fill rate520.6no data
Floating-point processing power16.66 TFLOPSno data
ROPs128no data
TMUs320no data
Tensor Cores640no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2no data
Maximum RAM amount32 GBno data
Memory bus width4096 Bitno data
Memory clock speed848 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth868.4 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPortno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12_1
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan1.2.131-
CUDA7.0-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD140−150
+438%
26
−438%
1440p80−85
+433%
15
−433%
4K55−60
+400%
11
−400%

Cost per frame, $

1080p64.28no data
1440p112.49no data
4K163.62no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 20
+0%
20
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 22
+0%
22
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21
+0%
21
+0%
Battlefield 5 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 36
+0%
36
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 16
+0%
16
+0%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Hitman 3 24
+0%
24
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 124
+0%
124
+0%
Metro Exodus 35
+0%
35
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 17
+0%
17
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 90
+0%
90
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 18
+0%
18
+0%
Battlefield 5 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 32
+0%
32
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 13
+0%
13
+0%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Hitman 3 23
+0%
23
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 112
+0%
112
+0%
Metro Exodus 28
+0%
28
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 26
+0%
26
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30
+0%
30
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 84
+0%
84
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14
+0%
14
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 23
+0%
23
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 11
+0%
11
+0%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Hitman 3 20
+0%
20
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 23
+0%
23
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 24
+0%
24
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14
+0%
14
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 14
+0%
14
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 7
+0%
7
+0%
Far Cry 5 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Hitman 3 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Metro Exodus 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 19
+0%
19
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Hitman 3 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Metro Exodus 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12
+0%
12
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry 5 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 11
+0%
11
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%

This is how Quadro GV100 and Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs compete in popular games:

  • Quadro GV100 is 438% faster in 1080p
  • Quadro GV100 is 433% faster in 1440p
  • Quadro GV100 is 400% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 72 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 51.46 9.47
Recency 27 March 2018 15 August 2020
Chip lithography 12 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 28 Watt

Quadro GV100 has a 443.4% higher aggregate performance score.

Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 20% more advanced lithography process, and 792.9% lower power consumption.

The Quadro GV100 is our recommended choice as it beats the Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro GV100 is a workstation card while Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is a notebook one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Quadro GV100
Quadro GV100
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
Like
Like

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Quadro GV100 Quadro GV100
vs
Pro W6800 Radeon Pro W6800
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
vs
R9 M485X Radeon R9 M485X
Quadro GV100 Quadro GV100
vs
RTX A4000 RTX A4000
RX Vega 11 Radeon RX Vega 11
vs
FX 580 Quadro FX 580
RX Vega 11 Radeon RX Vega 11
vs
RX 7900 XT Radeon RX 7900 XT
GTX 1060 6 GB Rev. 2 GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB Rev. 2
vs
RTX 2060 Max-Q GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q
GTX 1060 6 GB Rev. 2 GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB Rev. 2
vs
RTX A400 RTX A400
Quadro GV100 Quadro GV100
vs
R7 Mobile Graphics Radeon R7 Mobile Graphics
RX 560 896SP Radeon RX 560 896SP
vs
T500 Mobile Quadro T500 Mobile
Pro Vega 64 Radeon Pro Vega 64
vs
Steam Deck GPU Steam Deck GPU
P102-100 P102 100
vs
RX 7900 XTX Radeon RX 7900 XTX
R7 350 Radeon R7 350
vs
RX 560X Radeon RX 560X
R7 350 Radeon R7 350
vs
R7 M270DX Radeon R7 M270DX

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.8 53 votes

Rate Quadro GV100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 984 votes

Rate Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.