GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile vs Quadro GV100

#ad 
Buy
Quadro GV100 Tesla PG500-216 Tesla V100 FHHL Tesla V100 PCIe Tesla V100 PCIe 16 GB Tesla V100 PCIe 32 GB Tesla V100 SMX2 Tesla V100 SXM2 Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB Tesla V100 SXM2 32 GB Tesla V100 SXM3 32 GB Tesla V100S PCIe 32 GB
VS
#ad 
Buy
RTX 2070 Mobile RTX 2070 Max-Q RTX 2070 Max-Q Refresh RTX 2070 Mobile Refresh RTX 2070 Super Max-Q RTX 2070 Super Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro GV100 with GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, including specs and performance data.

Quadro GV100
2018
32 GB HBM2, 250 Watt
49.62
+41.3%

GV100 outperforms RTX 2070 Super Mobile by a considerable 41% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
Quadro GV100 Quadro GV100
RTX 2070 Super Mobile RTX 2070 Super

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking61143
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.00no data
Power efficiency14.0421.59
ArchitectureVolta (2017−2020)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameGV100TU104B
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date27 March 2018 (7 years ago)2 April 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$8,999 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores51202560
Core clock speed1132 MHz1140 MHz
Boost clock speed1627 MHz1380 MHz
Number of transistors21,100 million13,600 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt115 Watt
Texture fill rate520.6220.8
Floating-point processing power16.66 TFLOPS7.066 TFLOPS
ROPs12864
TMUs320160
Tensor Cores640320
Ray Tracing Coresno data40

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount32 GB8 GB
Memory bus width4096 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed848 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth868.4 GB/s448.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPortNo outputs
G-SYNC support-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Readyno data+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.140
CUDA7.07.5
DLSS++

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD160−170
+34.5%
119
−34.5%
1440p110−120
+41%
78
−41%
4K60−65
+33.3%
45
−33.3%

Cost per frame, $

1080p56.24no data
1440p81.81no data
4K149.98no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 166
+0%
166
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Far Cry 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Fortnite 164
+0%
164
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Valorant 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 152
+0%
152
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Dota 2 130
+0%
130
+0%
Far Cry 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Fortnite 156
+0%
156
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 129
+0%
129
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Metro Exodus 87
+0%
87
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 163
+0%
163
+0%
Valorant 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 141
+0%
141
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Dota 2 124
+0%
124
+0%
Far Cry 5 105
+0%
105
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 87
+0%
87
+0%
Valorant 163
+0%
163
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 129
+0%
129
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Metro Exodus 54
+0%
54
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 240−250
+0%
240−250
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 110
+0%
110
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Far Cry 5 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 93
+0%
93
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Metro Exodus 32
+0%
32
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 59
+0%
59
+0%
Valorant 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 63
+0%
63
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Dota 2 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 48
+0%
48
+0%

This is how Quadro GV100 and RTX 2070 Super Mobile compete in popular games:

  • Quadro GV100 is 34% faster in 1080p
  • Quadro GV100 is 41% faster in 1440p
  • Quadro GV100 is 33% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 66 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 49.62 35.11
Recency 27 March 2018 2 April 2020
Maximum RAM amount 32 GB 8 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 115 Watt

Quadro GV100 has a 41.3% higher aggregate performance score, and a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount.

RTX 2070 Super Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, and 117.4% lower power consumption.

The Quadro GV100 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro GV100 is a workstation card while GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Quadro GV100
Quadro GV100
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
GeForce RTX 2070 Super
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Quadro GV100 Quadro GV100
vs
RTX 8000 Quadro RTX 8000
RTX 2070 Super Mobile GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
vs
RX 6600M Radeon RX 6600M
Quadro GV100 Quadro GV100
vs
Pro W6800 Radeon Pro W6800
RX Vega 3 Radeon RX Vega 3
vs
L40G L40G
RX Vega 3 RX Vega 3
vs
RTX 3060 8 GB GA104 3060 8 GB GA104
GTX 1060 6 GB Rev. 2 GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB Rev. 2
vs
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
GTX 1060 6 GB Rev. 2 GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB Rev. 2
vs
Arc A730M Arc A730M
Quadro GV100 Quadro GV100
vs
P2000 Mobile Quadro P2000 Mobile
RX 6750 GRE RX 6750 GRE
vs
RX Vega Mobile RX Vega Mobile
GRID M10-8Q GRID M10 8Q
vs
RX 6600 Radeon RX 6600
GRID M60-4A GRID M60 4A
vs
L40 L40
Pro Vega 56 Radeon Pro Vega 56
vs
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
Pro Vega 56 Radeon Pro Vega 56
vs
RTX 3080 Mobile GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.8 54 votes

Rate Quadro GV100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 398 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro GV100 or GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.