A10G vs Quadro GV100

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro GV100 and A10G, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Quadro GV100
2018
32 GB HBM2, 250 Watt
44.00
+50.7%

GV100 outperforms A10G by an impressive 51% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking90200
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.20no data
Power efficiency14.2215.72
ArchitectureVolta (2017−2020)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameGV100GA102
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date27 March 2018 (7 years ago)12 April 2021 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$8,999 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores51209216
Core clock speed1132 MHz1320 MHz
Boost clock speed1627 MHz1710 MHz
Number of transistors21,100 million28,300 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt150 Watt
Texture fill rate520.6492.5
Floating-point processing power16.66 TFLOPS31.52 TFLOPS
ROPs12896
TMUs320288
Tensor Cores640288
Ray Tracing Coresno data72
L1 Cache10 MB9 MB
L2 Cache6 MB6 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length267 mm267 mm
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin8-pin EPS

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount32 GB12 GB
Memory bus width4096 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed848 MHz1563 MHz
Memory bandwidth868.4 GB/s600.2 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPortNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2
CUDA7.08.6
DLSS++

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Quadro GV100 44.00
+50.7%
A10G 29.19

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro GV100 19456
+50.7%
Samples: 34
A10G 12907
Samples: 2

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

Quadro GV100 145188
A10G 157193
+8.3%

GeekBench 5 Vulkan

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group.

Quadro GV100 137406
A10G 145863
+6.2%

GeekBench 5 CUDA

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses CUDA API by NVIDIA.

Quadro GV100 180942
A10G 187763
+3.8%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 44.00 29.19
Recency 27 March 2018 12 April 2021
Maximum RAM amount 32 GB 12 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 150 Watt

Quadro GV100 has a 50.7% higher aggregate performance score, and a 166.7% higher maximum VRAM amount.

A10G, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, a 50% more advanced lithography process, and 66.7% lower power consumption.

The Quadro GV100 is our recommended choice as it beats the A10G in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro GV100
Quadro GV100
NVIDIA A10G
A10G

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 55 votes

Rate Quadro GV100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 49 votes

Rate A10G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro GV100 or A10G, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.