Radeon Vega Frontier Edition Liquid vs Quadro GP100

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking92not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency12.60no data
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)GCN 1.4 (2017)
GPU code nameGP100Vega 10
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date1 October 2016 (8 years ago)27 June 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,499

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores35844096
Core clock speed1304 MHz1500 MHz
Boost clock speed1442 MHz1600 MHz
Number of transistors15,300 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology16 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)235 Watt375 Watt
Texture fill rate323.0409.6
Floating-point processing power10.34 TFLOPSno data
ROPs9664
TMUs224256

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length267 mm267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pin2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2HBM2
Maximum RAM amount16 GB16 GB
Memory bus width4096 Bit2048 Bit
Memory clock speed715 MHz1886 MHz
Memory bandwidth732.2 GB/s482.8 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 4x DisplayPort1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12.0
Shader Model6.45.0
OpenGL4.64.5
OpenCL1.22.1
Vulkan1.2.131-
CUDA6.0-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 October 2016 27 June 2017
Chip lithography 16 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 235 Watt 375 Watt

Quadro GP100 has 59.6% lower power consumption.

Vega Frontier Edition Liquid, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 months, and a 14.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro GP100 and Radeon Vega Frontier Edition Liquid. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro GP100 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon Vega Frontier Edition Liquid is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro GP100
Quadro GP100
AMD Radeon Vega Frontier Edition Liquid
Radeon Vega Frontier Edition Liquid

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 14 votes

Rate Quadro GP100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon Vega Frontier Edition Liquid on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.