Quadro GP100 vs Radeon RX Vega 64

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX Vega 64 with Quadro GP100, including specs and performance data.

RX Vega 64
2017
8 GB HBM2, 295 Watt
37.17

Quadro GP100 outperforms RX Vega 64 by a moderate 14% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking12592
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation24.01no data
ArchitectureVega (2017−2020)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameVegaGP100
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date14 August 2017 (7 years ago)1 October 2016 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$499 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores40963584
Core clock speed1630 MHz1304 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1442 MHz
Number of transistors12,500 million15,300 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)295 Watt235 Watt
Texture fill rate395.8323.0
Floating-point performance12.66 gflops10.34 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length279 mm267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pin1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2HBM2
Maximum RAM amount8 GB16 GB
Memory bus width2048 Bit4096 Bit
Memory clock speed945 MHz1430 MHz
Memory bandwidth483.8 GB/s732.2 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort1x DVI, 4x DisplayPort
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan1.1.1251.2.131
CUDA-6.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX Vega 64 37.17
Quadro GP100 42.45
+14.2%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX Vega 64 14338
Quadro GP100 16374
+14.2%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD117
−11.1%
130−140
+11.1%
1440p75
−13.3%
85−90
+13.3%
4K49
−12.2%
55−60
+12.2%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 65−70
−7.7%
70−75
+7.7%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 81
−11.1%
90−95
+11.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 83
−8.4%
90−95
+8.4%
Battlefield 5 186
−12.9%
210−220
+12.9%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 68
−10.3%
75−80
+10.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 65−70
−7.7%
70−75
+7.7%
Far Cry 5 112
−7.1%
120−130
+7.1%
Far Cry New Dawn 108
−11.1%
120−130
+11.1%
Forza Horizon 4 321
−9%
350−400
+9%
Hitman 3 84
−13.1%
95−100
+13.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 315
−11.1%
350−400
+11.1%
Metro Exodus 144
−11.1%
160−170
+11.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2 116
−12.1%
130−140
+12.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 178
−12.4%
200−210
+12.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion 261
−11.1%
290−300
+11.1%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 158
−13.9%
180−190
+13.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 69
−8.7%
75−80
+8.7%
Battlefield 5 170
−11.8%
190−200
+11.8%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 65
−7.7%
70−75
+7.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 65−70
−7.7%
70−75
+7.7%
Far Cry 5 86
−10.5%
95−100
+10.5%
Far Cry New Dawn 93
−7.5%
100−105
+7.5%
Forza Horizon 4 294
−2%
300−310
+2%
Hitman 3 81
−11.1%
90−95
+11.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 293
−2.4%
300−310
+2.4%
Metro Exodus 132
−13.6%
150−160
+13.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2 96
−4.2%
100−105
+4.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 164
−9.8%
180−190
+9.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 75−80
−10.4%
85−90
+10.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion 247
−13.4%
280−290
+13.4%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 51
−7.8%
55−60
+7.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 60
−8.3%
65−70
+8.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 54
−11.1%
60−65
+11.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 65−70
−7.7%
70−75
+7.7%
Far Cry 5 67
−11.9%
75−80
+11.9%
Forza Horizon 4 128
−9.4%
140−150
+9.4%
Hitman 3 73
−9.6%
80−85
+9.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn 100
−10%
110−120
+10%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 143
−11.9%
160−170
+11.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 77
−10.4%
85−90
+10.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion 54
−11.1%
60−65
+11.1%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 89
−12.4%
100−105
+12.4%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 70−75
−12.7%
80−85
+12.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 55−60
−14%
65−70
+14%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
−12.5%
45−50
+12.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 47
−6.4%
50−55
+6.4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 45
−11.1%
50−55
+11.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
−3.4%
30−33
+3.4%
Far Cry 5 40−45
−4.7%
45−50
+4.7%
Forza Horizon 4 210−220
−13.7%
240−250
+13.7%
Hitman 3 50
−10%
55−60
+10%
Horizon Zero Dawn 80
−12.5%
90−95
+12.5%
Metro Exodus 79
−13.9%
90−95
+13.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 100
−10%
110−120
+10%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50−55
−13.2%
60−65
+13.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion 243
−11.1%
270−280
+11.1%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 62
−12.9%
70−75
+12.9%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 59
−10.2%
65−70
+10.2%
Far Cry New Dawn 36
−11.1%
40−45
+11.1%
Hitman 3 38
−5.3%
40−45
+5.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 102
−7.8%
110−120
+7.8%
Metro Exodus 52
−5.8%
55−60
+5.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 48
−4.2%
50−55
+4.2%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 29
−3.4%
30−33
+3.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 28
−7.1%
30−33
+7.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 25
−8%
27−30
+8%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Far Cry 5 27
−11.1%
30−33
+11.1%
Forza Horizon 4 66
−13.6%
75−80
+13.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 59
−10.2%
65−70
+10.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion 21
+0%
21−24
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 31
−12.9%
35−40
+12.9%

This is how RX Vega 64 and Quadro GP100 compete in popular games:

  • Quadro GP100 is 11% faster in 1080p
  • Quadro GP100 is 13% faster in 1440p
  • Quadro GP100 is 12% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 37.17 42.45
Recency 14 August 2017 1 October 2016
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 16 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 295 Watt 235 Watt

RX Vega 64 has an age advantage of 10 months, and a 14.3% more advanced lithography process.

Quadro GP100, on the other hand, has a 14.2% higher aggregate performance score, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and 25.5% lower power consumption.

The Quadro GP100 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX Vega 64 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega 64 is a desktop card while Quadro GP100 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
Radeon RX Vega 64
NVIDIA Quadro GP100
Quadro GP100

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 665 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 64 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 14 votes

Rate Quadro GP100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.