Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) vs Quadro GP100

#ad 
Buy
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro GP100 with Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000), including specs and performance data.

Quadro GP100
2016
16 GB HBM2, 235 Watt
33.90
+771%

GP100 outperforms RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) by a whopping 771% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking127675
Place by popularitynot in top-10039
Power efficiency11.4320.55
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Vega (2017−2020)
GPU code nameGP100Vega Raven Ridge
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date1 October 2016 (8 years ago)26 October 2017 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3584512
Core clock speed1304 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed1442 MHz1200 MHz
Number of transistors15,300 million9,800 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)235 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate323.057.60
Floating-point processing power10.34 TFLOPS1.843 TFLOPS
ROPs968
TMUs22432

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16IGP
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2System Shared
Maximum RAM amount16 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width4096 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed715 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth732.2 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 4x DisplayPortNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.1
Vulkan1.2.1311.2
CUDA6.0-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Quadro GP100 33.90
+771%
RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) 3.89

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro GP100 15149
+772%
RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) 1737

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD150−160
+733%
18
−733%
4K85−90
+750%
10
−750%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 14
+0%
14
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 9
+0%
9
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 10
+0%
10
+0%
Battlefield 5 24
+0%
24
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 9
+0%
9
+0%
Far Cry 5 12
+0%
12
+0%
Fortnite 30
+0%
30
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 26
+0%
26
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 17
+0%
17
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 17
+0%
17
+0%
Valorant 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Battlefield 5 22
+0%
22
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 42
+0%
42
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 6
+0%
6
+0%
Dota 2 38
+0%
38
+0%
Far Cry 5 10
+0%
10
+0%
Fortnite 19
+0%
19
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 30
+0%
30
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 13
+0%
13
+0%
Metro Exodus 7
+0%
7
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14
+0%
14
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 13
+0%
13
+0%
Valorant 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 23
+0%
23
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 5
+0%
5
+0%
Dota 2 35
+0%
35
+0%
Far Cry 5 9
+0%
9
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 23
+0%
23
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14
+0%
14
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8
+0%
8
+0%
Valorant 15
+0%
15
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 10
+0%
10
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Metro Exodus 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Valorant 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry 5 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Valorant 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 6
+0%
6
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Dota 2 15
+0%
15
+0%
Far Cry 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 9
+0%
9
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

This is how Quadro GP100 and RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) compete in popular games:

  • Quadro GP100 is 733% faster in 1080p
  • Quadro GP100 is 750% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 59 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 33.90 3.89
Recency 1 October 2016 26 October 2017
Chip lithography 16 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 235 Watt 15 Watt

Quadro GP100 has a 771.5% higher aggregate performance score.

RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000), on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 14.3% more advanced lithography process, and 1466.7% lower power consumption.

The Quadro GP100 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro GP100 is a workstation card while Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro GP100
Quadro GP100
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000)
Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000)

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 14 votes

Rate Quadro GP100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 1576 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro GP100 or Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000), agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.