Arc A770 vs Quadro GP100

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Quadro GP100
2016
16 GB HBM2, 235 Watt
42.40
+64%

Quadro GP100 outperforms Arc A770 by an impressive 64% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking79193
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation14.3511.42
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Alchemist
GPU code nameGP100DG2-512
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date1 October 2016 (7 years ago)12 October 2022 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$329
Current price$1482 $597 (1.8x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Quadro GP100 has 26% better value for money than Arc A770.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores35844096
Core clock speed1304 MHz2100 MHz
Boost clock speed1442 MHz2400 MHz
Number of transistors15,300 million21,700 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)235 Watt225 Watt
Texture fill rate323.0614.4
Floating-point performance10,329 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pin1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount16 GB16 GB
Memory bus width4096 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1430 MHz16000 MHz
Memory bandwidth732.2 GB/s512.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 4x DisplayPort1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0
HDMIno data+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA6.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro GP100 42.40
+64%
Arc A770 25.85

Quadro GP100 outperforms Arc A770 by 64% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Quadro GP100 16374
+64%
Arc A770 9984

Quadro GP100 outperforms Arc A770 by 64% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD170−180
+56%
109
−56%
1440p100−110
+49.3%
67
−49.3%
4K65−70
+54.8%
42
−54.8%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 42.40 25.85
Recency 1 October 2016 12 October 2022
Chip lithography 16 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 235 Watt 225 Watt

The Quadro GP100 is our recommended choice as it beats the Arc A770 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro GP100 is a workstation graphics card while Arc A770 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro GP100
Quadro GP100
Intel Arc A770
Arc A770

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 14 votes

Rate Quadro GP100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.8 5108 votes

Rate Arc A770 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.