T550 Mobile vs Quadro FX 880M

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro FX 880M and T550 Mobile, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

FX 880M
2010
1 GB GDDR3, 35 Watt
0.58

T550 Mobile outperforms FX 880M by a whopping 2053% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1208396
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.1437.23
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameGT216TU117
Market segmentMobile workstationMobile workstation
Release date7 January 2010 (14 years ago)May 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores481024
Core clock speed550 MHz1065 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1665 MHz
Number of transistors486 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt23 Watt
Texture fill rate8.800106.6
Floating-point processing power0.1162 TFLOPS3.41 TFLOPS
ROPs832
TMUs1664

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedmedium sized
InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)PCIe 3.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1 GB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed790 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth25.28 GB/s96 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model4.16.6
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA1.27.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX 880M 0.58
T550 Mobile 12.49
+2053%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

FX 880M 223
T550 Mobile 4811
+2057%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

FX 880M 2639
T550 Mobile 25155
+853%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD19
−168%
51
+168%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−433%
16−18
+433%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
−525%
24−27
+525%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−600%
21−24
+600%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−433%
16−18
+433%
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−2800%
27−30
+2800%
Hitman 3 5−6
−280%
18−20
+280%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−12
−409%
55−60
+409%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
−467%
30−35
+467%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−33
−113%
60−65
+113%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
−525%
24−27
+525%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−600%
21−24
+600%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−433%
16−18
+433%
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−2800%
27−30
+2800%
Hitman 3 5−6
−280%
18−20
+280%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−12
−409%
55−60
+409%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
−600%
42
+600%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−170%
27−30
+170%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−33
−113%
60−65
+113%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
−525%
24−27
+525%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−600%
21−24
+600%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−433%
16−18
+433%
Hitman 3 5−6
−280%
18−20
+280%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−12
−409%
55−60
+409%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
−500%
36
+500%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−100%
20
+100%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−33
−113%
60−65
+113%

1440p
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−1500%
16−18
+1500%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 0−1 10−11
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−1100%
12−14
+1100%
Hitman 3 6−7
−117%
12−14
+117%
Horizon Zero Dawn 3−4
−600%
21−24
+600%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
−6400%
65−70
+6400%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−467%
16−18
+467%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−500%
6−7
+500%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 5−6

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−400%
10−11
+400%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Battlefield 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Battlefield 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Hitman 3 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Metro Exodus 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry 5 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

This is how FX 880M and T550 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • T550 Mobile is 168% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the T550 Mobile is 6400% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • T550 Mobile is ahead in 35 tests (50%)
  • there's a draw in 35 tests (50%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.58 12.49
Recency 7 January 2010 on May 2022
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 23 Watt

T550 Mobile has a 2053.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 233.3% more advanced lithography process, and 52.2% lower power consumption.

The T550 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro FX 880M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M
Quadro FX 880M
NVIDIA T550 Mobile
T550 Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 41 vote

Rate Quadro FX 880M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 26 votes

Rate T550 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.