GeForce MX570 vs Quadro FX 880M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
350M 360M 370M 380M 550M 570M 770M 880M
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
MX570 MX570 A RTX 2050 Max-Q RTX 2050 Mobile RTX 3050 Max-Q RTX 3050 Max-Q Refresh 4 GB RTX 3050 Max-Q Refresh 6 GB RTX 3050 Mobile RTX 3050 Mobile Refresh RTX 3050 Mobile Refresh 4 GB RTX 3050 Mobile Refresh 6 GB RTX 3050 Ti Max-Q

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro FX 880M with GeForce MX570, including specs and performance data.

FX 880M
2010
1 GB GDDR3, 35 Watt
0.56

MX570 outperforms 880M by a whopping 2355% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
FX 880M FX 880M
GeForce MX570 GeForce MX570

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1274410
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.2342.26
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameGT216GA107
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date7 January 2010 (16 years ago)May 2022 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores482048
Core clock speed550 MHz832 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1155 MHz
Number of transistors486 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology40 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt25 Watt
Texture fill rate8.80073.92
Floating-point processing power0.1162 TFLOPS4.731 TFLOPS
ROPs840
TMUs1664
Tensor Coresno data64
Ray Tracing Coresno data16
L1 Cacheno data2 MB
L2 Cache64 KB2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)PCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1 GB2 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed790 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth25.28 GB/s96 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.16.6
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA1.28.6
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

FX 880M 0.56
GeForce MX570 13.75
+2355%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

FX 880M 236
Samples: 777
GeForce MX570 5750
+2336%
Samples: 41

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD20
−90%
38
+90%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−2800%
27−30
+2800%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−420%
24−27
+420%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−2800%
27−30
+2800%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−1080%
55−60
+1080%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−420%
24−27
+420%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−538%
50−55
+538%
Valorant 27−30
−321%
110−120
+321%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 18−20
−956%
190−200
+956%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−2800%
27−30
+2800%
Dota 2 10−12
−718%
90−95
+718%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−1080%
55−60
+1080%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−420%
24−27
+420%
Metro Exodus 0−1 27−30
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−538%
50−55
+538%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−640%
35−40
+640%
Valorant 27−30
−321%
110−120
+321%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−2800%
27−30
+2800%
Dota 2 10−12
−718%
90−95
+718%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−1080%
55−60
+1080%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−420%
24−27
+420%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−538%
50−55
+538%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−580%
34
+580%
Valorant 27−30
−321%
110−120
+321%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
−800%
27−30
+800%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 2−3
−5100%
100−110
+5100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7
−2067%
130−140
+2067%

1440p
Ultra

Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−1600%
30−35
+1600%
Hogwarts Legacy 0−1 14−16
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−900%
20−22
+900%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 0−1 30−35

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−85.7%
24−27
+85.7%
Valorant 3−4
−2433%
75−80
+2433%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−550%
12−14
+550%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
−600%
14−16
+600%

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 122
+0%
122
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 106
+0%
106
+0%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Fortnite 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 40
+0%
40
+0%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Fortnite 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 54
+0%
54
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%

1440p
High

Grand Theft Auto V 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Metro Exodus 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Valorant 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Far Cry 5 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Metro Exodus 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Dota 2 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Far Cry 5 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

This is how FX 880M and GeForce MX570 compete in popular games:

  • GeForce MX570 is 90% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the GeForce MX570 is 5100% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GeForce MX570 performs better in 31 tests (49%)
  • there's a draw in 32 tests (51%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 0.56 13.75
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 25 Watt

GeForce MX570 has a 2355.4% higher aggregate performance score, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 400% more advanced lithography process, and 40% lower power consumption.

The GeForce MX570 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro FX 880M in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro FX 880M is a mobile workstation graphics card while GeForce MX570 is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M
Quadro FX 880M
NVIDIA GeForce MX570
GeForce MX570
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

FX 880M Quadro FX 880M
vs
FX 2500M Quadro FX 2500M
GeForce MX570 GeForce MX570
vs
GTX 970M GeForce GTX 970M
FX 880M Quadro FX 880M
vs
FX 770M Quadro FX 770M
FX 880M NVIDIA FX 880M
vs
T1000 Mobile T1000 Mobile
FX 880M NVIDIA FX 880M
vs
RTX 8000 Passive 8000 Passive
FX 880M NVIDIA FX 880M
vs
T400 Mobile T400 Mobile
FX 880M NVIDIA FX 880M
vs
T600 Mobile T600 Mobile
FX 880M NVIDIA FX 880M
vs
T1200 Mobile T1200 Mobile
FX 880M NVIDIA FX 880M
vs
RX 6650 XT 6650 XT
FX 880M NVIDIA FX 880M
vs
RTX 3050 Mobile Refresh 6 GB 3050 Mobile Refresh 6 GB
FX 880M NVIDIA FX 880M
vs
T500 Max-Q Max-Q
FX 880M NVIDIA FX 880M
vs
T600 Max-Q Max-Q
NVS 5100M NVIDIA NVS 5100M
vs
510 OEM 510 OEM

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.3 43 votes

Rate Quadro FX 880M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 114 votes

Rate GeForce MX570 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro FX 880M or GeForce MX570, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.