UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs vs Quadro FX 770M
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Quadro FX 770M with UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs, including specs and performance data.
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs outperforms FX 770M by a whopping 715% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 1263 | 697 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 1.13 | 11.54 |
| Architecture | Tesla (2006−2010) | Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022) |
| GPU code name | G96 | Tiger Lake Xe |
| Market segment | Mobile workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 14 August 2008 (16 years ago) | 15 August 2020 (4 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $527 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 32 | 48 |
| Core clock speed | 500 MHz | 350 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 1450 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 314 million | no data |
| Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 28 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 8.000 | no data |
| Floating-point processing power | 0.08 TFLOPS | no data |
| ROPs | 8 | no data |
| TMUs | 16 | no data |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | medium sized | no data |
| Interface | MXM-II | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR3 | no data |
| Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | no data |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | no data |
| Memory clock speed | 800 MHz | no data |
| Memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB/s | no data |
| Shared memory | - | + |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | no data |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| Quick Sync | no data | + |
API and SDK compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12_1 |
| Shader Model | 4.0 | no data |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | no data |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | no data |
| Vulkan | N/A | - |
| CUDA | 1.1 | - |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 2−3
−750%
| 17
+750%
|
Cost per frame, $
| 1080p | 263.50 | no data |
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
−1000%
|
11
+1000%
|
| God of War | 5−6
−160%
|
13
+160%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
−800%
|
9−10
+800%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 4−5
−400%
|
20−22
+400%
|
| God of War | 5−6
−100%
|
10−11
+100%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 8−9
−113%
|
16−18
+113%
|
| Valorant | 27−30
−33.3%
|
36
+33.3%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 16−18
−47.1%
|
25
+47.1%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
−800%
|
9−10
+800%
|
| Dota 2 | 10−12
−136%
|
26
+136%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 4−5
−400%
|
20−22
+400%
|
| God of War | 5−6
−100%
|
10−11
+100%
|
| Metro Exodus | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 8−9
−113%
|
16−18
+113%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 6−7
−150%
|
15
+150%
|
| Valorant | 27−30
−107%
|
55−60
+107%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
−800%
|
9−10
+800%
|
| Dota 2 | 10−12
−118%
|
24
+118%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 4−5
−400%
|
20−22
+400%
|
| God of War | 5−6
−100%
|
10−11
+100%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 8−9
−113%
|
16−18
+113%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 6−7
−33.3%
|
8
+33.3%
|
| Valorant | 27−30
−107%
|
55−60
+107%
|
1440p
High Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 2−3
−300%
|
8−9
+300%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 2−3
−1550%
|
30−35
+1550%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 6−7
−450%
|
30−35
+450%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Forza Horizon 4 | 2−3
−400%
|
10−11
+400%
|
1440p
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 1−2
−700%
|
8−9
+700%
|
4K
High Preset
| Grand Theft Auto V | 14−16
−6.7%
|
16−18
+6.7%
|
| Valorant | 3−4
−600%
|
21−24
+600%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 2−3
−150%
|
5−6
+150%
|
4K
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 2−3
−150%
|
5−6
+150%
|
Full HD
Low Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 46
+0%
|
46
+0%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 19
+0%
|
19
+0%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 29
+0%
|
29
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 16
+0%
|
16
+0%
|
| Fortnite | 24−27
+0%
|
24−27
+0%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 15
+0%
|
15
+0%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 16
+0%
|
16
+0%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 7
+0%
|
7
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 15
+0%
|
15
+0%
|
| Fortnite | 24−27
+0%
|
24−27
+0%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 14
+0%
|
14
+0%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 10
+0%
|
10
+0%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 14
+0%
|
14
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 14
+0%
|
14
+0%
|
Full HD
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 24−27
+0%
|
24−27
+0%
|
1440p
High Preset
| Grand Theft Auto V | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
| Metro Exodus | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
| Valorant | 45−50
+0%
|
45−50
+0%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 8−9
+0%
|
8−9
+0%
|
| God of War | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
| Dota 2 | 14−16
+0%
|
14−16
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
| God of War | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
This is how FX 770M and UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs compete in popular games:
- UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs is 750% faster in 1080p
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs is 1550% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs is ahead in 31 tests (52%)
- there's a draw in 29 tests (48%)
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.52 | 4.24 |
| Recency | 14 August 2008 | 15 August 2020 |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 28 Watt |
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs has a 715.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, a 550% more advanced lithography process, and 25% lower power consumption.
The UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro FX 770M in performance tests.
Be aware that Quadro FX 770M is a mobile workstation graphics card while UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs is a mobile workstation one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
