GeForce RTX 4080 vs Quadro FX 570M

Place in the ranking	1352	2
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	29.07
Power efficiency	0.41	19.40
Architecture	Tesla (2006−2010)	Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code name	G84	AD103
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Desktop
Release date	1 June 2007 (17 years ago)	20 September 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$1,199

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	32	9728
Core clock speed	475 MHz	2205 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	2505 MHz
Number of transistors	289 million	45,900 million
Manufacturing process technology	80 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	45 Watt	320 Watt
Texture fill rate	7.600	761.5
Floating-point processing power	0.0608 TFLOPS	48.74 TFLOPS
ROPs	8	112
TMUs	16	304
Tensor Cores	no data	304
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	76

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	medium sized	no data
Interface	PCIe 1.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	no data	310 mm
Width	no data	3-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR3	GDDR6X
Maximum RAM amount	512 MB	16 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	700 MHz	1400 MHz
Memory bandwidth	22.4 GB/s	716.8 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI	-	+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11.1 (10_0)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	4.0	6.7
OpenGL	3.3	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	3.0
Vulkan	N/A	1.3
CUDA	1.1	8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX 570M 0.27

RTX 4080 90.01
+33237%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

FX 570M 104

RTX 4080 34593
+33163%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	0−1	237
1440p	-0−1	165
4K	-0−1	106

Cost per frame, $

1080p	no data	5.06
1440p	no data	7.27
4K	no data	11.31

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	6−7 −3300%	200−210 +3300%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −7600%	231 +7600%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Counter-Strike 2	6−7 −3517%	217 +3517%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −3733%	115 +3733%
Forza Horizon 4	5−6 −10440%	527 +10440%
Red Dead Redemption 2	4−5 −3800%	150−160 +3800%

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	6−7 −3267%	202 +3267%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −3400%	105 +3400%
Far Cry 5	6−7 −2483%	155 +2483%
Forza Horizon 4	5−6 −10140%	512 +10140%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	6−7 −3483%	210−220 +3483%
Red Dead Redemption 2	4−5 −3800%	150−160 +3800%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	4−5 −4250%	170−180 +4250%
World of Tanks	12−14 −2225%	270−280 +2225%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2	6−7 −3017%	187 +3017%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −3067%	95 +3067%
Far Cry 5	6−7 −2850%	170−180 +2850%
Forza Horizon 4	5−6 −9500%	480 +9500%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	6−7 −3483%	210−220 +3483%

1440p
High Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS

1−2

−17400%

170−180
+17400%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2	30−35 −303%	125 +303%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −2067%	65 +2067%
Far Cry 5	4−5 −3900%	160−170 +3900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	4−5 −4675%	191 +4675%
Valorant	4−5 −12025%	485 +12025%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2	14−16 −1133%	185 +1133%
Grand Theft Auto V	14−16 −1133%	185 +1133%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	0−1	200−210
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 −1133%	185 +1133%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	0−1	90−95
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −1500%	32 +1500%
Dota 2	14−16 −1413%	227 +1413%
Valorant	0−1	245

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	110−120 +0%	110−120 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	250−260 +0%	250−260 +0%
Metro Exodus	173 +0%	173 +0%
Valorant	751 +0%	751 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	110−120 +0%	110−120 +0%
Dota 2	201 +0%	201 +0%
Fortnite	300−350 +0%	300−350 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	276 +0%	276 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	178 +0%	178 +0%
Metro Exodus	172 +0%	172 +0%
Valorant	600−650 +0%	600−650 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	110−120 +0%	110−120 +0%
Dota 2	233 +0%	233 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	250−260 +0%	250−260 +0%
Valorant	575 +0%	575 +0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	162 +0%	162 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	162 +0%	162 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	90−95 +0%	90−95 +0%
World of Tanks	500−550 +0%	500−550 +0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	85−90 +0%	85−90 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	390 +0%	390 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	191 +0%	191 +0%
Metro Exodus	149 +0%	149 +0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	107 +0%	107 +0%
Metro Exodus	104 +0%	104 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	60−65 +0%	60−65 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2	120−130 +0%	120−130 +0%
Far Cry 5	100−110 +0%	100−110 +0%
Fortnite	95−100 +0%	95−100 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	195 +0%	195 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	119 +0%	119 +0%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the RTX 4080 is 17400% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

RTX 4080 is ahead in 30 tests (49%)
there's a draw in 31 test (51%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.27	90.01
Recency	1 June 2007	20 September 2022
Maximum RAM amount	512 MB	16 GB
Chip lithography	80 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	45 Watt	320 Watt

FX 570M has 611.1% lower power consumption.

RTX 4080, on the other hand, has a 33237% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 15 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1500% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 4080 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro FX 570M in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro FX 570M is a mobile workstation card while GeForce RTX 4080 is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.