GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB vs Quadro FX 570M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro FX 570M with GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB, including specs and performance data.

FX 570M
2007
512 MB GDDR3, 45 Watt
0.22

1050 Mobile 3 GB outperforms 570M by a whopping 4809% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1425454
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.3911.63
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameG84GP107
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date1 June 2007 (18 years ago)1 February 2019 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores32768
Core clock speed475 MHz1366 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1442 MHz
Number of transistors289 million3,300 million
Manufacturing process technology80 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate7.60069.22
Floating-point processing power0.0608 TFLOPS2.215 TFLOPS
ROPs824
TMUs1648
L1 Cacheno data288 KB
L2 Cache32 KB768 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount512 MB3 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit96 Bit
Memory clock speed700 MHz1752 MHz
Memory bandwidth22.4 GB/s84.1 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model4.06.4
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/A1.2
CUDA1.16.1

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−4400%
45−50
+4400%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−4700%
240−250
+4700%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−4400%
45−50
+4400%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−4567%
140−150
+4567%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−4700%
240−250
+4700%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−4186%
300−310
+4186%
Valorant 24−27
−4700%
1200−1250
+4700%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 12−14
−4483%
550−600
+4483%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−4400%
45−50
+4400%
Dota 2 9−10
−4344%
400−450
+4344%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−4567%
140−150
+4567%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−4700%
240−250
+4700%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−4186%
300−310
+4186%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−4700%
240−250
+4700%
Valorant 24−27
−4700%
1200−1250
+4700%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−4400%
45−50
+4400%
Dota 2 9−10
−4344%
400−450
+4344%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−4567%
140−150
+4567%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−4700%
240−250
+4700%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−4186%
300−310
+4186%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−4700%
240−250
+4700%
Valorant 24−27
−4700%
1200−1250
+4700%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 2−3
−4650%
95−100
+4650%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−4650%
95−100
+4650%

1440p
Ultra

Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−4400%
45−50
+4400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−4400%
45−50
+4400%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−4543%
650−700
+4543%
Valorant 1−2
−4400%
45−50
+4400%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2
−4400%
45−50
+4400%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
−4650%
95−100
+4650%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.22 10.80
Recency 1 June 2007 1 February 2019
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 3 GB
Chip lithography 80 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 75 Watt

FX 570M has 66.7% lower power consumption.

GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB, on the other hand, has a 4809.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 471.4% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro FX 570M in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro FX 570M is a mobile workstation graphics card while GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro FX 570M
Quadro FX 570M
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB
GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.8 4 votes

Rate Quadro FX 570M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 69 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro FX 570M or GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.