GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB vs Quadro FX 570

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro FX 570 with GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB, including specs and performance data.

FX 570
2007
256 MB DDR2, 38 Watt
0.60

GTX 1050 3 GB outperforms FX 570 by a whopping 2105% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1196381
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.0912.22
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameG84GP107
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date12 September 2007 (17 years ago)21 May 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$199 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores16768
Core clock speed460 MHz1392 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1518 MHz
Number of transistors289 million3,300 million
Manufacturing process technology80 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)38 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate3.68072.86
Floating-point processing power0.02944 TFLOPS2.332 TFLOPS
ROPs824
TMUs848

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length198 mm145 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount256 MB3 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit96 Bit
Memory clock speed400 MHz1752 MHz
Memory bandwidth12.8 GB/s84.1 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model4.06.4
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA1.16.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX 570 0.60
GTX 1050 3 GB 13.23
+2105%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

FX 570 232
GTX 1050 3 GB 5105
+2100%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.60 13.23
Recency 12 September 2007 21 May 2018
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 3 GB
Chip lithography 80 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 38 Watt 75 Watt

FX 570 has 97.4% lower power consumption.

GTX 1050 3 GB, on the other hand, has a 2105% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, a 1100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 471.4% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro FX 570 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro FX 570 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro FX 570
Quadro FX 570
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB
GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 15 votes

Rate Quadro FX 570 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 338 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.