UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs vs Quadro FX 5600

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
FX 4600 FX 4600 SDI FX 5600 FX 5600 Mac Edition Plex 1000 Model IV Plex 2100 S4 Tesla C870 Tesla D870 Tesla S870
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Iris Xe Graphics G7 Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G1 Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G4 Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) Xe 750 32EUs Xe G1 Xe G4 48EUs

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro FX 5600 with UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs, including specs and performance data.

FX 5600
2007, $2,999
1536 MB GDDR3, 171 Watt
1.25

Graphics G4 48EUs outperforms FX 5600 by a whopping 239% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
FX 5600 FX 5600
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1073715
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.5611.68
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)
GPU code nameG80Tiger Lake Xe
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date5 March 2007 (18 years ago)15 August 2020 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,999 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores12848
Core clock speed600 MHz350 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1450 MHz
Number of transistors681 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology90 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)171 Watt28 Watt
Texture fill rate38.40no data
Floating-point processing power0.3456 TFLOPSno data
ROPs24no data
TMUs32no data
L2 Cache96 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16no data
Length254 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3no data
Maximum RAM amount1536 MBno data
Memory bus width384 Bitno data
Memory clock speed800 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth76.8 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-Videono data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12_1
Shader Model4.0no data
OpenGL3.3no data
OpenCL1.1no data
VulkanN/A-
CUDA+-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD4−5
−300%
16
+300%

Cost per frame, $

1080p749.75no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 46
+0%
46
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 11
+0%
11
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 19
+0%
19
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 29
+0%
29
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Far Cry 5 16
+0%
16
+0%
Fortnite 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 15
+0%
15
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Valorant 36
+0%
36
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 16
+0%
16
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 7
+0%
7
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 25
+0%
25
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Dota 2 26
+0%
26
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Far Cry 5 15
+0%
15
+0%
Fortnite 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 14
+0%
14
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 10
+0%
10
+0%
Metro Exodus 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 15
+0%
15
+0%
Valorant 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 14
+0%
14
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Dota 2 24
+0%
24
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Far Cry 5 14
+0%
14
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8
+0%
8
+0%
Valorant 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Metro Exodus 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Valorant 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Far Cry 5 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Valorant 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Dota 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

This is how FX 5600 and UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs compete in popular games:

  • UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs is 300% faster in 1080p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 60 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 1.25 4.24
Recency 5 March 2007 15 August 2020
Chip lithography 90 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 171 Watt 28 Watt

UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs has a 239.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 13 years, a 800% more advanced lithography process, and 510.7% lower power consumption.

The UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro FX 5600 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro FX 5600 is a workstation graphics card while UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Quadro FX 5600
Quadro FX 5600
Intel UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

FX 5600 Quadro FX 5600
vs
GRID K160Q GRID K160Q
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs
vs
RX Vega 5 Radeon RX Vega 5
FX 5600 Quadro FX 5600
vs
FirePro V3900 FirePro V3900
FX 5600 NVIDIA FX 5600
vs
R7 430 OEM 430 OEM
FX 5600 NVIDIA FX 5600
vs
6800 Ultra DDL 6800 Ultra DDL
FX 5600 NVIDIA FX 5600
vs
ATI FireMV 2200 PCI 2200 PCI
FX 5600 NVIDIA FX 5600
vs
T1000 Max-Q T1000 Max-Q
FX 5600 NVIDIA FX 5600
vs
Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G1 Xe Graphics G1
FX 5600 Mac Edition NVIDIA FX 5600 Mac Edition
vs
ION
NVS 285 NVIDIA NVS 285
vs
R5 235 OEM 235 OEM
NVS 285 NVIDIA NVS 285
vs
605 OEM 605 OEM
NVS 285 NVIDIA NVS 285
vs
ATI HD 4700 4700
NVS 285 NVIDIA NVS 285
vs
Ice Lake GT3e GT3e

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.7 7 votes

Rate Quadro FX 5600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 541 votes

Rate UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro FX 5600 or UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.