GeForce GTX 760M vs Quadro FX 5600

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
FX 4600 FX 4600 SDI FX 5600 FX 5600 Mac Edition Plex 1000 Model IV Plex 2100 S4 Tesla C870 Tesla D870 Tesla S870
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
760A 760M 765M 765M SLI 770M 770M SLI 775M 775M Mac Edition 780M 780M Mac Edition 780M SLI

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro FX 5600 with GeForce GTX 760M, including specs and performance data.

FX 5600
2007, $2,999
1536 MB GDDR3, 171 Watt
1.26

760M outperforms FX 5600 by a whopping 228% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
FX 5600 FX 5600
GTX 760M GTX 760M

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1074724
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.575.77
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameG80GK106
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date5 March 2007 (18 years ago)30 May 2013 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,999 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores128768
Core clock speed600 MHz657 MHz
Boost clock speedno data657 MHz
Number of transistors681 million2,540 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)171 Watt55 Watt
Texture fill rate38.4042.05
Floating-point processing power0.3456 TFLOPS1.009 TFLOPS
ROPs2416
TMUs3264
L1 Cacheno data64 KB
L2 Cache96 KB256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
Bus supportno dataPCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0
InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length254 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pinno data
SLI options-+

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount1536 MB2 GB
Standard memory configurationno dataGDDR5
Memory bus width384 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth76.8 GB/s64.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-VideoNo outputs
eDP 1.2 signal supportno dataUp to 3840x2160
LVDS signal supportno dataUp to 1920x1200
VGA аnalog display supportno dataUp to 2048x1536
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) supportno dataUp to 3840x2160
HDMI-+
HDCP content protection-+
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI-+
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Blu-Ray 3D Support-+
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder-+
Optimus-+
3D Vision / 3DTV Play-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 API
Shader Model4.05.1
OpenGL3.34.5
OpenCL1.11.1
VulkanN/A1.1.126
CUDA++

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

FX 5600 1.26
GTX 760M 4.13
+228%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

FX 5600 525
Samples: 73
GTX 760M 1727
+229%
Samples: 474

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p10−12
−290%
39
+290%
Full HD14−16
−229%
46
+229%

Cost per frame, $

1080p214.21no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Fortnite 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Valorant 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 98
+0%
98
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Dota 2 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Fortnite 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Metro Exodus 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Valorant 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Dota 2 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Valorant 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Metro Exodus 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Valorant 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Far Cry 5 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Valorant 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 0−1 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Dota 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

This is how FX 5600 and GTX 760M compete in popular games:

  • GTX 760M is 290% faster in 900p
  • GTX 760M is 229% faster in 1080p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 59 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 1.26 4.13
Recency 5 March 2007 30 May 2013
Maximum RAM amount 1536 MB 2 GB
Chip lithography 90 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 171 Watt 55 Watt

GTX 760M has a 227.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 33.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 221.4% more advanced lithography process, and 210.9% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 760M is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro FX 5600 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro FX 5600 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce GTX 760M is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Quadro FX 5600
Quadro FX 5600
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M
GeForce GTX 760M
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

FX 5600 Quadro FX 5600
vs
GRID K160Q GRID K160Q
GTX 760M GeForce GTX 760M
vs
Iris Plus Graphics 655 Iris Plus Graphics 655
FX 5600 Quadro FX 5600
vs
FirePro V3900 FirePro V3900
FX 4600 Quadro FX 4600
vs
ATI V3800 FirePro V3800
FX 4600 Quadro FX 4600
vs
ATI V8800 FirePro V8800
FX 4600 Quadro FX 4600
vs
Vega 8 Efficient Vega 8 Efficient
FX 4600 Quadro FX 4600
vs
MX450 30.5W 10Gbps GeForce MX450 30.5W 10Gbps
FX 4600 Quadro FX 4600
vs
MX450 30.5W 8Gbps GeForce MX450 30.5W 8Gbps
FX 5600 Quadro FX 5600
vs
Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB
FX 5600 Quadro FX 5600
vs
9600 GSO 512 GeForce 9600 GSO 512
FX 5600 Quadro FX 5600
vs
P104-100 P104 100
FX 5600 Quadro FX 5600
vs
P106-100 P106 100
FX 5600 Quadro FX 5600
vs
P106-090 P106 090

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.7 7 votes

Rate Quadro FX 5600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 112 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 760M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro FX 5600 or GeForce GTX 760M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.