FireStream 9250 vs Quadro FX 5600

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro FX 5600 and FireStream 9250, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

FX 5600
2007, $2,999
1536 MB GDDR3, 171 Watt
1.26

FireStream 9250 outperforms FX 5600 by a whopping 121% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1079845
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.571.42
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameG80RV770
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date5 March 2007 (18 years ago)16 June 2008 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,999 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores128800
Core clock speed600 MHz625 MHz
Number of transistors681 million956 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)171 Watt150 Watt
Texture fill rate38.4025.00
Floating-point processing power0.3456 TFLOPS1 TFLOPS
ROPs2416
TMUs3240
L1 Cacheno data160 KB
L2 Cache96 KB256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length254 mmno data
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pin1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount1536 MB1 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz993 MHz
Memory bandwidth76.8 GB/s63.55 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-Video1x DVI

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)10.1 (10_1)
Shader Model4.04.1
OpenGL3.33.3
OpenCL1.11.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

FX 5600 1.26
FireStream 9250 2.78
+121%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

FX 5600 525
Samples: 73
FireStream 9250 1164
+122%
Samples: 2

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.26 2.78
Recency 5 March 2007 16 June 2008
Maximum RAM amount 1536 MB 1 GB
Chip lithography 90 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 171 Watt 150 Watt

FX 5600 has a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount.

FireStream 9250, on the other hand, has a 120.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, a 63.6% more advanced lithography process, and 14% lower power consumption.

The FireStream 9250 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro FX 5600 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro FX 5600
Quadro FX 5600
AMD FireStream 9250
FireStream 9250

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 7 votes

Rate Quadro FX 5600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 6 votes

Rate FireStream 9250 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro FX 5600 or FireStream 9250, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.