Arc 7-Cores iGPU vs Quadro FX 560

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
500 540 550 560 570 580
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Arc 7-Core iGPU Arc 7-Cores iGPU Arc 8-Core iGPU 4-Core iGPU (Arc) 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro FX 560 with Arc 7-Cores iGPU, including specs and performance data.

FX 560
2006
128 MB GDDR3, 30 Watt
0.27

7-Cores iGPU outperforms FX 560 by a whopping 5570% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
FX 560 FX 560
Arc 7-Cores iGPU Arc 7-Cores iGPU

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1402378
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.70no data
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)Xe LPG (2023)
GPU code nameG73Meteor Lake iGPU
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date20 April 2006 (19 years ago)14 December 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$299 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data7
Core clock speed350 MHzno data
Boost clock speedno data2200 MHz
Number of transistors177 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology90 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)30 Wattno data
Texture fill rate4.200no data
ROPs8no data
TMUs12no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16no data
Length198 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3no data
Maximum RAM amount128 MBno data
Memory bus width128 Bitno data
Memory clock speed600 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth19.2 GB/sno data
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-Videono data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12_2
Shader Model3.0no data
OpenGL2.1no data
OpenCLN/Ano data
VulkanN/A-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD0−134

Cost per frame, $

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 90
+0%
90
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 32
+0%
32
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 31
+0%
31
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 58
+0%
58
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 27
+0%
27
+0%
Far Cry 5 38
+0%
38
+0%
Fortnite 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 27
+0%
27
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Valorant 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 31
+0%
31
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 23
+0%
23
+0%
Far Cry 5 34
+0%
34
+0%
Fortnite 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 23
+0%
23
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 17
+0%
17
+0%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 52
+0%
52
+0%
Valorant 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 22
+0%
22
+0%
Far Cry 5 35
+0%
35
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 13
+0%
13
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 22
+0%
22
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Metro Exodus 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Valorant 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Metro Exodus 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Valorant 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Far Cry 5 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 59 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 0.27 15.31
Recency 20 April 2006 14 December 2023
Chip lithography 90 nm 5 nm

Arc 7-Cores iGPU has a 5570.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 17 years, and a 1700% more advanced lithography process.

The Arc 7-Cores iGPU is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro FX 560 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro FX 560 is a workstation graphics card while Arc 7-Cores iGPU is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Quadro FX 560
Quadro FX 560
Intel Arc 7-Cores iGPU
Arc 7-Cores iGPU
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

FX 560 Quadro FX 560
vs
FirePro 2270 FirePro 2270
Arc 7-Cores iGPU Arc 7 Cores iGPU
vs
Arc 7-Core iGPU Arc 7 Core iGPU
FX 560 Quadro FX 560
vs
FX 580 Quadro FX 580
Tesla S870 Tesla S870
vs
P104-100 P104 100
FX 4600 Quadro FX 4600
vs
GT 335M GT 335M
NVS 285 Quadro NVS 285
vs
310 OEM GeForce 310 OEM
FX 3500 Quadro FX 3500
vs
RTX A5000 Max-Q RTX A5000 Max-Q
FX 5500 Quadro FX 5500
vs
7300 GT AGP GeForce 7300 GT AGP
FX 540 Quadro FX 540
vs
GT 720 OEM GT 720 OEM
FX 3400 Quadro FX 3400
vs
RTX 3060 Ti RTX 3060 Ti
FX 1100 Quadro FX 1100
vs
HD Graphics P4700 Graphics P4700
NVS 280 PCI Quadro NVS 280 PCI
vs
Arc A550M Arc A550M
FX 1000 Quadro FX 1000
vs
GeForce 805A GeForce 805A

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3 5 votes

Rate Quadro FX 560 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 109 votes

Rate Arc 7-Cores iGPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro FX 560 or Arc 7-Cores iGPU, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.