Quadro FX 1700 vs Quadro FX 5500

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1188not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.45no data
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameG71G84
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date20 April 2006 (18 years ago)12 September 2007 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,999 $699

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data32
Core clock speed650 MHz460 MHz
Number of transistors278 million289 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm80 nm
Power consumption (TDP)96 Watt42 Watt
Texture fill rate15.607.360
Floating-point processing powerno data0.05888 TFLOPS
ROPs168
TMUs2416

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Length229 mm168 mm
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR2
Maximum RAM amount1 GB512 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed505 MHz400 MHz
Memory bandwidth32.32 GB/s25.6 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-Video2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model3.04.0
OpenGL2.13.3
OpenCLN/A1.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-1.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.



Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

FX 5500 242
+33.7%
FX 1700 181

Pros & cons summary


Recency 20 April 2006 12 September 2007
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 512 MB
Chip lithography 90 nm 80 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 96 Watt 42 Watt

FX 5500 has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

FX 1700, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 12.5% more advanced lithography process, and 128.6% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Quadro FX 5500 and Quadro FX 1700. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro FX 5500
Quadro FX 5500
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700
Quadro FX 1700

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 4 votes

Rate Quadro FX 5500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 24 votes

Rate Quadro FX 1700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.