Radeon RX 7900 XTX vs Quadro FX 550
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Quadro FX 550 with Radeon RX 7900 XTX, including specs and performance data.
RX 7900 XTX outperforms FX 550 by a whopping 49593% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
Place in the ranking | 1463 | 11 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | 68 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 42.04 |
Power efficiency | 0.38 | 15.97 |
Architecture | Curie (2003−2013) | RDNA 3.0 (2022−2025) |
GPU code name | NV43 | Navi 31 |
Market segment | Workstation | Desktop |
Release date | 20 April 2006 (19 years ago) | 3 November 2022 (2 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $999 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | no data | 6144 |
Core clock speed | 360 MHz | 1929 MHz |
Boost clock speed | no data | 2498 MHz |
Number of transistors | 146 million | 57,700 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 110 nm | 5 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 30 Watt | 355 Watt |
Texture fill rate | 2.880 | 959.2 |
Floating-point processing power | no data | 61.39 TFLOPS |
ROPs | 4 | 192 |
TMUs | 8 | 384 |
Ray Tracing Cores | no data | 96 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Length | 198 mm | 287 mm |
Width | 1-slot | 2-slot |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 2x 8-pin |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR6 |
Maximum RAM amount | 128 MB | 24 GB |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 400 MHz | 2500 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 12.8 GB/s | 960.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | - |
Resizable BAR | - | + |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video | 1x HDMI 2.1a, 2x DisplayPort 2.1, 1x USB Type-C |
HDMI | - | + |
API and SDK compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
DirectX | 9.0c (9_3) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
Shader Model | 3.0 | 6.7 |
OpenGL | 2.0 (full) 2.1 (partial) | 4.6 |
OpenCL | N/A | 2.2 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.3 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark score.
Passmark
This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
Full HD | -0−1 | 240 |
1440p | -0−1 | 159 |
4K | -0−1 | 100 |
Cost per frame, $
1080p | no data | 4.16 |
1440p | no data | 6.28 |
4K | no data | 9.99 |
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
Counter-Strike 2 | 355
+0%
|
355
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 250
+0%
|
250
+0%
|
Sons of the Forest | 133
+0%
|
133
+0%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
Battlefield 5 | 190−200
+0%
|
190−200
+0%
|
Counter-Strike 2 | 348
+0%
|
348
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 240
+0%
|
240
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 212
+0%
|
212
+0%
|
Fortnite | 300−350
+0%
|
300−350
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 338
+0%
|
338
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 5 | 269
+0%
|
269
+0%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 170−180
+0%
|
170−180
+0%
|
Sons of the Forest | 129
+0%
|
129
+0%
|
Valorant | 450−500
+0%
|
450−500
+0%
|
Full HD
High Preset
Battlefield 5 | 190−200
+0%
|
190−200
+0%
|
Counter-Strike 2 | 339
+0%
|
339
+0%
|
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 280−290
+0%
|
280−290
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 217
+0%
|
217
+0%
|
Dota 2 | 197
+0%
|
197
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 205
+0%
|
205
+0%
|
Fortnite | 300−350
+0%
|
300−350
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 330
+0%
|
330
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 5 | 254
+0%
|
254
+0%
|
Grand Theft Auto V | 175
+0%
|
175
+0%
|
Metro Exodus | 239
+0%
|
239
+0%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 170−180
+0%
|
170−180
+0%
|
Sons of the Forest | 124
+0%
|
124
+0%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 545
+0%
|
545
+0%
|
Valorant | 450−500
+0%
|
450−500
+0%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
Battlefield 5 | 190−200
+0%
|
190−200
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 207
+0%
|
207
+0%
|
Dota 2 | 178
+0%
|
178
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 189
+0%
|
189
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 295
+0%
|
295
+0%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 170−180
+0%
|
170−180
+0%
|
Sons of the Forest | 123
+0%
|
123
+0%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 298
+0%
|
298
+0%
|
Valorant | 450−500
+0%
|
450−500
+0%
|
Full HD
Epic Preset
Fortnite | 300−350
+0%
|
300−350
+0%
|
1440p
High Preset
Counter-Strike 2 | 267
+0%
|
267
+0%
|
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 500−550
+0%
|
500−550
+0%
|
Grand Theft Auto V | 165
+0%
|
165
+0%
|
Metro Exodus | 161
+0%
|
161
+0%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 170−180
+0%
|
170−180
+0%
|
Valorant | 450−500
+0%
|
450−500
+0%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
Battlefield 5 | 190−200
+0%
|
190−200
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 146
+0%
|
146
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 187
+0%
|
187
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 290
+0%
|
290
+0%
|
Sons of the Forest | 118
+0%
|
118
+0%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 238
+0%
|
238
+0%
|
1440p
Epic Preset
Fortnite | 150−160
+0%
|
150−160
+0%
|
4K
High Preset
Counter-Strike 2 | 67
+0%
|
67
+0%
|
Grand Theft Auto V | 186
+0%
|
186
+0%
|
Metro Exodus | 108
+0%
|
108
+0%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 197
+0%
|
197
+0%
|
Valorant | 300−350
+0%
|
300−350
+0%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
Battlefield 5 | 130−140
+0%
|
130−140
+0%
|
Counter-Strike 2 | 43
+0%
|
43
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 73
+0%
|
73
+0%
|
Dota 2 | 159
+0%
|
159
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 159
+0%
|
159
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 227
+0%
|
227
+0%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 95−100
+0%
|
95−100
+0%
|
Sons of the Forest | 103
+0%
|
103
+0%
|
4K
Epic Preset
Fortnite | 75−80
+0%
|
75−80
+0%
|
All in all, in popular games:
- there's a draw in 65 tests (100%)
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 0.15 | 74.54 |
Recency | 20 April 2006 | 3 November 2022 |
Maximum RAM amount | 128 MB | 24 GB |
Chip lithography | 110 nm | 5 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 30 Watt | 355 Watt |
FX 550 has 1083.3% lower power consumption.
RX 7900 XTX, on the other hand, has a 49593.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 16 years, a 19100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 2100% more advanced lithography process.
The Radeon RX 7900 XTX is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro FX 550 in performance tests.
Be aware that Quadro FX 550 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon RX 7900 XTX is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.