ATI Radeon HD 4650 AGP vs Quadro FX 540

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro FX 540 with Radeon HD 4650 AGP, including specs and performance data.

FX 540
2004, $299
128 MB DDR, 25 Watt
0.19

HD 4650 AGP outperforms FX 540 by a whopping 163% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking14681300
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.580.80
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameNV43RV730
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date9 August 2004 (21 years ago)10 September 2008 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$299 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data320
Core clock speed300 MHz600 MHz
Number of transistors146 million514 million
Manufacturing process technology110 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt48 Watt
Texture fill rate2.40019.20
Floating-point processing powerno data0.384 TFLOPS
ROPs48
TMUs832
L1 Cacheno data64 KB
L2 Cacheno data128 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16AGP 8x
Length198 mmno data
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRDDR2
Maximum RAM amount128 MB512 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed250 MHz400 MHz
Memory bandwidth8 GB/s12.8 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)10.1 (10_1)
Shader Model3.04.1
OpenGL2.0 (full) 2.1 (partial)3.3
OpenCLN/A1.1
VulkanN/AN/A

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

FX 540 0.19
ATI HD 4650 AGP 0.50
+163%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

FX 540 80
Samples: 27
ATI HD 4650 AGP 207
+159%
Samples: 3

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.19 0.50
Recency 9 August 2004 10 September 2008
Maximum RAM amount 128 MB 512 MB
Chip lithography 110 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 48 Watt

FX 540 has 92% lower power consumption.

ATI HD 4650 AGP, on the other hand, has a 163.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon HD 4650 AGP is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro FX 540 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro FX 540 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon HD 4650 AGP is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro FX 540
Quadro FX 540
ATI Radeon HD 4650 AGP
Radeon HD 4650 AGP

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 14 votes

Rate Quadro FX 540 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 23 votes

Rate Radeon HD 4650 AGP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro FX 540 or Radeon HD 4650 AGP, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.