Radeon HD 8410G vs Quadro FX 4800

Place in performance ranking	791	1042
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.10	0.03
Architecture	Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)	TeraScale 3 (2010−2013)
GPU code name	GT200B	Trinity
Market segment	Workstation	Laptop
Release date	11 November 2008 (15 years ago)	23 May 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$1,799	no data
Current price	$632 (0.4x MSRP)	$338

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

FX 4800 has 233% better value for money than HD 8410G.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	192	192
Core clock speed	602 MHz	450 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	600 MHz
Number of transistors	1,400 million	1,303 million
Manufacturing process technology	55 nm	32 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	150 Watt	35 Watt
Texture fill rate	38.53	8.640
Floating-point performance	462.3 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Quadro FX 4800 and Radeon HD 8410G compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	IGP
Length	267 mm	no data
Width	2-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR3	System Shared
Maximum RAM amount	1536 MB	System Shared
Memory bus width	384 Bit	System Shared
Memory clock speed	1600 MHz	System Shared
Memory bandwidth	76.8 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	no data	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video

No outputs

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11.1 (10_0)	11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model	4.0	5.0
OpenGL	3.3	4.4
OpenCL	1.1	1.2
Vulkan	N/A	N/A
CUDA	1.3	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX 4800 2.54
+125%

HD 8410G 1.13

Quadro FX 4800 outperforms Radeon HD 8410G by 125% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

FX 4800 981
+126%

HD 8410G 435

Quadro FX 4800 outperforms Radeon HD 8410G by 126% in Passmark.