GeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition vs Quadro FX 4800

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro FX 4800 with GeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition, including specs and performance data.

FX 4800
2008, $1,799
1536 MB GDDR3, 150 Watt
2.38

780M Mac Edition outperforms FX 4800 by a whopping 157% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking884625
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.02no data
Power efficiency1.233.89
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameGT200BGK104
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date11 November 2008 (17 years ago)8 November 2013 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,799 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1921536
Core clock speed602 MHz771 MHz
Boost clock speedno data797 MHz
Number of transistors1,400 million3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt122 Watt
Texture fill rate38.53102.0
Floating-point processing power0.4623 TFLOPS2.448 TFLOPS
ROPs2432
TMUs64128
L1 Cacheno data128 KB
L2 Cache192 KB512 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16MXM-B (3.0)
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount1536 MB4 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth76.8 GB/s160.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 (11_0)
Shader Model4.05.1
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/A1.1.126
CUDA1.33.0

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.38 6.12
Recency 11 November 2008 8 November 2013
Maximum RAM amount 1536 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 122 Watt

GTX 780M Mac Edition has a 157.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 166.7% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 96.4% more advanced lithography process, and 23% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro FX 4800 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro FX 4800 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800
Quadro FX 4800
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition
GeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 68 votes

Rate Quadro FX 4800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 8 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro FX 4800 or GeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.