Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling vs Quadro FX 4700 X2

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking998not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.01no data
Power efficiency0.55no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameG92Vega 10
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date18 April 2008 (17 years ago)7 August 2017 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,999 $699

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores128 ×24096
Core clock speed600 MHz1408 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1668 MHz
Number of transistors754 million12,500 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)226 Watt345 Watt
Texture fill rate38.40 ×2427.0
Floating-point processing power0.384 TFLOPS ×213.66 TFLOPS
ROPs16 ×264
TMUs64 ×2256
L1 Cacheno data1 MB
L2 Cache64 KB4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length267 mm282 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3HBM2
Maximum RAM amount1 GB ×28 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit ×22048 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz945 MHz
Memory bandwidth51.2 GB/s ×2483.8 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-Video1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model4.06.4
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.12.0
VulkanN/A1.1.125
CUDA1.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 18 April 2008 7 August 2017
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 65 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 226 Watt 345 Watt

FX 4700 X2 has 53% lower power consumption.

RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 364% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro FX 4700 X2 and Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro FX 4700 X2 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Quadro FX 4700 X2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 30 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro FX 4700 X2 or Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.