Radeon HD 7540D IGP vs Quadro FX 4700 X2

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking998not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.01no data
Power efficiency0.55no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)TeraScale 3 (2010−2013)
GPU code nameG92Scrapper
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date18 April 2008 (17 years ago)2 October 2012 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,999 $67

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores128 ×2192
Core clock speed600 MHz760 MHz
Number of transistors754 million1,303 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm32 nm
Power consumption (TDP)226 Watt65 Watt
Texture fill rate38.40 ×29.120
Floating-point processing power0.384 TFLOPS ×20.2918 TFLOPS
ROPs16 ×24
TMUs64 ×212
L2 Cache64 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16IGP
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount1 GB ×2System Shared
Memory bus width256 Bit ×2System Shared
Memory clock speed800 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth51.2 GB/s ×2no data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model4.05.0
OpenGL3.34.4
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA1.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 18 April 2008 2 October 2012
Chip lithography 65 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 226 Watt 65 Watt

HD 7540D IGP has an age advantage of 4 years, a 103% more advanced lithography process, and 248% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Quadro FX 4700 X2 and Radeon HD 7540D IGP. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro FX 4700 X2 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon HD 7540D IGP is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Quadro FX 4700 X2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 87 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7540D IGP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro FX 4700 X2 or Radeon HD 7540D IGP, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.