Radeon RX 6750 XT vs Quadro FX 4600

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Quadro FX 4600 Quadro FX 4600 SDI Quadro FX 5600 Quadro FX 5600 Mac Edition Quadro Plex 1000 Model IV Quadro Plex 2100 S4 Tesla C870 Tesla D870 Tesla S870
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Radeon RX 6700 Radeon RX 6700 XT Radeon RX 6750 GRE Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10 GB Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB Radeon RX 6750 XT

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro FX 4600 with Radeon RX 6750 XT, including specs and performance data.

FX 4600
2007
768 MB GDDR3, 134 Watt
1.03

RX 6750 XT outperforms FX 4600 by a whopping 4796% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

FX 4600 FX 4600
RX 6750 XT RX 6750 XT

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking108950
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.0151.94
Power efficiency0.5714.87
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code nameG80Navi 22
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date5 March 2007 (17 years ago)3 March 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,999 $549

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

RX 6750 XT has 519300% better value for money than FX 4600.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores962560
Core clock speed500 MHz2150 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2600 MHz
Number of transistors681 million17,200 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)134 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate24.00416.0
Floating-point processing power0.2304 TFLOPS13.31 TFLOPS
ROPs2464
TMUs24160
Ray Tracing Coresno data40

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length229 mm267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount768 MB12 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed700 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth67.2 GB/s432.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-Video1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.06.5
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.12.1
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX 4600 1.03
RX 6750 XT 50.43
+4796%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

FX 4600 425
RX 6750 XT 20783
+4790%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD3−4
−5400%
165
+5400%
1440p1−2
−8600%
87
+8600%
4K1−2
−5000%
51
+5000%

Cost per frame, $

1080p666.33
−19926%
3.33
+19926%
1440p1999.00
−31578%
6.31
+31578%
4K1999.00
−18470%
10.76
+18470%
  • RX 6750 XT has 19926% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • RX 6750 XT has 31578% lower cost per frame in 1440p
  • RX 6750 XT has 18470% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 166
+0%
166
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 165
+0%
165
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 130
+0%
130
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 64
+0%
64
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 368
+0%
368
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 142
+0%
142
+0%
Metro Exodus 150
+0%
150
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 100−105
+0%
100−105
+0%
Valorant 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 109
+0%
109
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 54
+0%
54
+0%
Dota 2 159
+0%
159
+0%
Far Cry 5 49
+0%
49
+0%
Fortnite 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 304
+0%
304
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 162
+0%
162
+0%
Metro Exodus 120
+0%
120
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 100−105
+0%
100−105
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%
World of Tanks 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 96
+0%
96
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 49
+0%
49
+0%
Dota 2 131
+0%
131
+0%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 260
+0%
260
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 129
+0%
129
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
Valorant 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 106
+0%
106
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 106
+0%
106
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
World of Tanks 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 30
+0%
30
+0%
Far Cry 5 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 186
+0%
186
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Metro Exodus 126
+0%
126
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Valorant 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Dota 2 104
+0%
104
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 104
+0%
104
+0%
Metro Exodus 47
+0%
47
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 104
+0%
104
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 11
+0%
11
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 13
+0%
13
+0%
Dota 2 101
+0%
101
+0%
Far Cry 5 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Fortnite 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 99
+0%
99
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Valorant 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

This is how FX 4600 and RX 6750 XT compete in popular games:

  • RX 6750 XT is 5400% faster in 1080p
  • RX 6750 XT is 8600% faster in 1440p
  • RX 6750 XT is 5000% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 63 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 1.03 50.43
Recency 5 March 2007 3 March 2022
Maximum RAM amount 768 MB 12 GB
Chip lithography 90 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 134 Watt 250 Watt

FX 4600 has 86.6% lower power consumption.

RX 6750 XT, on the other hand, has a 4796.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 14 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1185.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 6750 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro FX 4600 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro FX 4600 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon RX 6750 XT is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600
Quadro FX 4600
AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT
Radeon RX 6750 XT
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

FX 4600 Quadro FX 4600
vs
Quadro 410 Quadro 410
RX 6750 XT Radeon RX 6750 XT
vs
RTX 3060 Ti GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
FX 4600 Quadro FX 4600
vs
FX 1800 Quadro FX 1800
FX 4800 FX 4800
vs
GT 625 OEM GT 625 OEM
FX 5800 FX 5800
vs
RTX 3050 4 GB RTX 3050 4 GB
NVS 450 NVS 450
vs
RX 550X RX 550X
Plex 2100 S4 Plex 2100 S4
vs
RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile
FX 3700 FX 3700
vs
HD Graphics 2000 HD Graphics 2000
FX 5500 FX 5500
vs
R5 340X OEM R5 340X OEM
FX 1400 FX 1400
vs
RTX 4500 Ada Generation RTX 4500 Ada Generation
FX 2000 FX 2000
vs
FX 5800 FX 5800
S7100X S7100X
vs
RX 5600 OEM RX 5600 OEM
S7100X S7100X
vs
RX 6800 RX 6800

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.8 13 votes

Rate Quadro FX 4600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 2683 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6750 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.