Radeon RX 5900 XT vs Quadro FX 4600

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1167not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.55no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)
GPU code nameG80Navi 21
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date5 March 2007 (19 years ago)no data
Launch price (MSRP)$1,999 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores964352
Core clock speed500 MHzno data
Boost clock speedno data1735 MHz
Number of transistors681 million21,000 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)134 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rate24.00471.9
Floating-point processing power0.2304 TFLOPS15.1 TFLOPS
ROPs2496
TMUs24272
L2 Cache96 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length229 mmno data
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount768 MB12 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed700 MHz14000 MHz
Memory bandwidth67.2 GB/s672.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-Video1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model4.0no data
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.1no data
VulkanN/A-
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 768 MB 12 GB
Chip lithography 90 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 134 Watt 300 Watt

FX 4600 has 124% lower power consumption.

RX 5900 XT, on the other hand, has a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1186% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro FX 4600 and Radeon RX 5900 XT. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro FX 4600 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon RX 5900 XT is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 13 votes

Rate Quadro FX 4600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 73 votes

Rate Radeon RX 5900 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro FX 4600 or Radeon RX 5900 XT, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.