GeForce GT 640M Mac Edition vs Quadro FX 4600

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro FX 4600 with GeForce GT 640M Mac Edition, including specs and performance data.

FX 4600
2007
768 MB GDDR3, 134 Watt
1.11
+6.7%

FX 4600 outperforms GT 640M Mac Edition by a small 7% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking10851100
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.612.39
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameG80GK107
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date5 March 2007 (17 years ago)3 February 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,999 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores96384
Core clock speed500 MHz745 MHz
Number of transistors681 million1,270 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)134 Watt32 Watt
Texture fill rate24.0023.84
Floating-point processing power0.2304 TFLOPS0.5722 TFLOPS
ROPs248
TMUs2432

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length229 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount768 MB512 MB
Memory bus width384 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed700 MHz1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth67.2 GB/s40 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 (11_0)
Shader Model4.05.1
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/A1.1.126
CUDA+3.0

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.11 1.04
Recency 5 March 2007 3 February 2013
Maximum RAM amount 768 MB 512 MB
Chip lithography 90 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 134 Watt 32 Watt

FX 4600 has a 6.7% higher aggregate performance score, and a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount.

GT 640M Mac Edition, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, a 221.4% more advanced lithography process, and 318.8% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Quadro FX 4600 and GeForce GT 640M Mac Edition.

Be aware that Quadro FX 4600 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce GT 640M Mac Edition is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600
Quadro FX 4600
NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M Mac Edition
GeForce GT 640M Mac Edition

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 12 votes

Rate Quadro FX 4600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 9 votes

Rate GeForce GT 640M Mac Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.