Radeon 780M vs Quadro FX 4400

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated338
Place by popularitynot in top-10059
Power efficiencyno data82.79
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2025)
GPU code nameNV45Hawx Point
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date28 July 2005 (19 years ago)6 December 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,399 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data768
Core clock speed375 MHz800 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2700 MHz
Number of transistors222 million25,390 million
Manufacturing process technology130 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)83 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate4.500129.6
Floating-point processing powerno data8.294 TFLOPS
ROPs1232
TMUs1248
Ray Tracing Coresno data12

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount512 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed525 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth33.6 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-VideoPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model3.06.8
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCLN/A2.1
VulkanN/A1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 28 July 2005 6 December 2023
Chip lithography 130 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 83 Watt 15 Watt

Radeon 780M has an age advantage of 18 years, a 3150% more advanced lithography process, and 453.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Quadro FX 4400 and Radeon 780M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro FX 4400 is a workstation card while Radeon 780M is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro FX 4400
Quadro FX 4400
AMD Radeon 780M
Radeon 780M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 15 votes

Rate Quadro FX 4400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 1929 votes

Rate Radeon 780M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro FX 4400 or Radeon 780M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.