Radeon RX 5770 vs Quadro FX 4000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1433not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.13no data
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)
GPU code nameNV40Navi 10
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date1 April 2004 (21 years ago)no data
Launch price (MSRP)$2,199 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Core clock speed375 MHz1000 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1000 MHz
Number of transistors222 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology130 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)142 Watt225 Watt
Texture fill rate4.500no data
ROPs8no data
TMUs12no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 8xPCIe 4.0 x16
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x Molexno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3no data
Maximum RAM amount256 MBno data
Memory bus width256 Bitno data
Memory clock speed500 MHz14000 MHz
Memory bandwidth32 GB/sno data
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12.0 (12_1)
Shader Model3.0no data
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCLN/Ano data
VulkanN/A-

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 130 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 142 Watt 225 Watt

FX 4000 has 58.5% lower power consumption.

RX 5770, on the other hand, has a 1757.1% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro FX 4000 and Radeon RX 5770. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro FX 4000 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon RX 5770 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro FX 4000
Quadro FX 4000
AMD Radeon RX 5770
Radeon RX 5770

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 22 votes

Rate Quadro FX 4000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 18 votes

Rate Radeon RX 5770 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro FX 4000 or Radeon RX 5770, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.