Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition vs Quadro FX 4000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1433not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.13no data
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)
GPU code nameNV40Grenada
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date1 April 2004 (22 years ago)5 May 2015 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,199 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data1792
Core clock speed375 MHz834 MHz
Number of transistors222 million6,200 million
Manufacturing process technology130 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)142 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate4.50093.41
Floating-point processing powerno data2.989 TFLOPS
ROPs832
TMUs12112

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 8xMXM-B (3.0)
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x MolexNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount256 MB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed500 MHz1365 MHz
Memory bandwidth32 GB/s174.7 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12 (12_0)
Shader Model3.06.3
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCLN/A2.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 April 2004 5 May 2015
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 130 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 142 Watt 250 Watt

FX 4000 has 76% lower power consumption.

R9 M395 Mac Edition, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 11 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 364% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro FX 4000 and Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro FX 4000 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 22 votes

Rate Quadro FX 4000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 7 votes

Rate Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro FX 4000 or Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.