GeForce 8200M G mGPU vs Quadro FX 4000

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1350not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.13no data
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameNV40C79
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date1 April 2004 (20 years ago)3 June 2008 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,199 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data16
Core clock speed375 MHz400 MHz
Number of transistors222 million314 million
Manufacturing process technology130 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)142 Watt12 Watt
Texture fill rate4.5003.200
Floating-point processing powerno data0.0256 TFLOPS
ROPs84
TMUs128

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 8xPCIe 2.0 x16
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x Molexno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount256 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed500 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth32 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model3.04.0
OpenGL2.13.3
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 April 2004 3 June 2008
Chip lithography 130 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 142 Watt 12 Watt

8200M G mGPU has an age advantage of 4 years, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 1083.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Quadro FX 4000 and GeForce 8200M G mGPU Intel. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro FX 4000 is a workstation card while GeForce 8200M G mGPU Intel is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro FX 4000
Quadro FX 4000
NVIDIA GeForce 8200M G mGPU Intel
GeForce 8200M G mGPU Intel

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 21 vote

Rate Quadro FX 4000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 3 votes

Rate GeForce 8200M G mGPU Intel on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.