ATI FireGL X1-256 vs Quadro FX 380M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1402not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.89no data
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)Rage 8 (2002−2007)
GPU code nameGT218R300
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release date7 January 2010 (16 years ago)1 July 2002 (23 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores16no data
Core clock speed606 MHz325 MHz
Number of transistors260 million110 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt37 Watt
Texture fill rate4.8482.600
Floating-point processing power0.04698 TFLOPSno data
ROPs48
TMUs88
L2 Cache32 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16AGP 8x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR
Maximum RAM amount512 MB256 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed790 MHz310 MHz
Memory bandwidth12.64 GB/s19.84 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_1)9.0 (9_0)
Shader Model4.1no data
OpenGL3.32.0
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 7 January 2010 1 July 2002
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 256 MB
Chip lithography 40 nm 150 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 37 Watt

FX 380M has an age advantage of 7 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 275% more advanced lithography process, and 48% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Quadro FX 380M and FireGL X1-256. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro FX 380M is a mobile workstation graphics card while FireGL X1-256 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro FX 380M
Quadro FX 380M
ATI FireGL X1-256
FireGL X1-256

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 2 votes

Rate Quadro FX 380M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate FireGL X1-256 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro FX 380M or FireGL X1-256, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.