ATI Radeon 8500 vs Quadro FX 3800

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro FX 3800 with Radeon 8500, including specs and performance data.

FX 3800
2009, $799
1 GB GDDR3, 108 Watt
1.97
+19600%

FX 3800 outperforms 8500 by a whopping 19600% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking9391567
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.04no data
Power efficiency1.400.03
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)Rage 7 (2001−2006)
GPU code nameGT200BR200
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date30 March 2009 (16 years ago)14 August 2001 (24 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$799 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores192no data
Core clock speed600 MHz275 MHz
Number of transistors1,400 million60 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)108 Watt23 Watt
Texture fill rate38.402.200
Floating-point processing power0.4623 TFLOPSno data
ROPs164
TMUs648
L2 Cache128 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16AGP 4x
Length198 mmno data
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR
Maximum RAM amount1 GB64 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz275 MHz
Memory bandwidth51.2 GB/s8.8 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)8.1
Shader Model4.0no data
OpenGL3.31.4
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA1.3-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

FX 3800 1.97
+19600%
ATI 8500 0.01

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

FX 3800 823
+13617%
Samples: 810
ATI 8500 6
Samples: 1

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.97 0.01
Recency 30 March 2009 14 August 2001
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 64 MB
Chip lithography 55 nm 150 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 108 Watt 23 Watt

FX 3800 has a 19600% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 172.7% more advanced lithography process.

ATI 8500, on the other hand, has 369.6% lower power consumption.

The Quadro FX 3800 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon 8500 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro FX 3800 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon 8500 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800
Quadro FX 3800
ATI Radeon 8500
Radeon 8500

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 51 votes

Rate Quadro FX 3800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 109 votes

Rate Radeon 8500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro FX 3800 or Radeon 8500, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.