GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile vs Quadro FX 3800

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
CX FX 3800 FX 4800 FX 4800 Mac Edition FX 5800 Plex 2200 S4 Tesla C1060 Tesla C1080 Tesla M1060 Tesla S1070 Tesla S1075 Tesla T10 Processor
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
2070 Mobile 2070 Max-Q 2070 Max-Q Refresh 2070 Mobile Refresh 2070 Super Max-Q 2070 Super Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro FX 3800 with GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, including specs and performance data.

FX 3800
2009, $799
1 GB GDDR3, 108 Watt
1.96

RTX 2070 Super Mobile outperforms FX 3800 by a whopping 1595% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
FX 3800 FX 3800
RTX 2070 Super Mobile RTX 2070 Super Mobile

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking933171
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.04no data
Power efficiency1.4022.28
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameGT200BTU104B
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date30 March 2009 (16 years ago)2 April 2020 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$799 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1922560
Core clock speed600 MHz1140 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1380 MHz
Number of transistors1,400 million13,600 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)108 Watt115 Watt
Texture fill rate38.40220.8
Floating-point processing power0.4623 TFLOPS7.066 TFLOPS
ROPs1664
TMUs64160
Tensor Coresno data320
Ray Tracing Coresno data40
L1 Cacheno data2.5 MB
L2 Cache128 KB4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length198 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1 GB8 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth51.2 GB/s448.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 2x DisplayPortNo outputs
G-SYNC support-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Readyno data+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.06.5
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/A1.2.140
CUDA1.37.5
DLSS-+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD7−8
−1600%
119
+1600%
1440p4−5
−1850%
78
+1850%
4K2−3
−2150%
45
+2150%

Cost per frame, $

1080p114.14no data
1440p199.75no data
4K399.50no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 166
+0%
166
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 121
+0%
121
+0%
Far Cry 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Fortnite 164
+0%
164
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Valorant 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 152
+0%
152
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Dota 2 130
+0%
130
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 121
+0%
121
+0%
Far Cry 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Fortnite 156
+0%
156
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 129
+0%
129
+0%
Metro Exodus 87
+0%
87
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 163
+0%
163
+0%
Valorant 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 141
+0%
141
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Dota 2 124
+0%
124
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 121
+0%
121
+0%
Far Cry 5 105
+0%
105
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 87
+0%
87
+0%
Valorant 163
+0%
163
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 129
+0%
129
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Metro Exodus 54
+0%
54
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 240−250
+0%
240−250
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 110
+0%
110
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 81
+0%
81
+0%
Far Cry 5 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 93
+0%
93
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Metro Exodus 32
+0%
32
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 59
+0%
59
+0%
Valorant 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 63
+0%
63
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Dota 2 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 41
+0%
41
+0%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 48
+0%
48
+0%

This is how FX 3800 and RTX 2070 Super Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX 2070 Super Mobile is 1600% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 2070 Super Mobile is 1850% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 2070 Super Mobile is 2150% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 64 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 1.96 33.23
Recency 30 March 2009 2 April 2020
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 108 Watt 115 Watt

FX 3800 has 6.5% lower power consumption.

RTX 2070 Super Mobile, on the other hand, has a 1595.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 358.3% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro FX 3800 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro FX 3800 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800
Quadro FX 3800
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

FX 3800 Quadro FX 3800
vs
FirePro W2100 FirePro W2100
RTX 2070 Super Mobile GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
vs
RX 6600M Radeon RX 6600M
FX 3800 Quadro FX 3800
vs
Quadro 2000 Quadro 2000
FX 3800 NVIDIA FX 3800
vs
HD 7950 Monica BIOS 2 7950 Monica BIOS 2
FX 3800 NVIDIA FX 3800
vs
P102-100 100
FX 3800 NVIDIA FX 3800
vs
Vega 8 Embedded 8 Embedded
FX 3800 NVIDIA FX 3800
vs
RTX 2070 Max-Q 2070 Max-Q
FX 3800 NVIDIA FX 3800
vs
GMA
FX 3800 NVIDIA FX 3800
vs
RTX 2070 Max-Q Refresh 2070 Max-Q Refresh
FX 3800 NVIDIA FX 3800
vs
RTX 2070 Mobile Refresh 2070 Mobile Refresh
FX 3800 NVIDIA FX 3800
vs
Arc Graphics 128EU Mobile 128EU Mobile
FX 3800 NVIDIA FX 3800
vs
RTX 4070 GDDR6 4070 GDDR6
NVS 440 NVIDIA NVS 440
vs
RX 6750 GRE 12 GB 6750 GRE 12 GB

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.1 51 votes

Rate Quadro FX 3800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 406 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro FX 3800 or GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.