GeForce GT 520 vs Quadro FX 380

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1146
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.01
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)
GPU code nameG96GF119
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date30 March 2009 (15 years ago)13 April 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$129 $59

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1648
CUDA coresno data48
Core clock speed450 MHz810 MHz
Number of transistors314 million292 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)34 Watt29 Watt
Maximum GPU temperatureno data102 °C
Texture fill rate3.6006.480
Floating-point processing power0.0352 gflops0.1555 gflops
ROPs84
TMUs88

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportno data16x PCI-E 2.0
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length198 mm145 mm
Heightno data2.7" (6.9 cm)
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR3
Maximum RAM amount256 MB1 GB (DDR3)
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1400 MHz900 MHz (DDR3)
Memory bandwidth22.4 GB/s14.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVIDual Link DVI-IHDMIVGA (optional)
Multi monitor supportno data+
HDMI-+
Maximum VGA resolutionno data2048x1536
Audio input for HDMIno dataInternal

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 (11_0)
Shader Model4.05.1
OpenGL3.34.2
OpenCL1.11.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA1.1+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

FX 380 157
GT 520 310
+97.5%

Pros & cons summary


Recency 30 March 2009 13 April 2011
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 1 GB (DDR3)
Chip lithography 65 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 34 Watt 29 Watt

GT 520 has an age advantage of 2 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 62.5% more advanced lithography process, and 17.2% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Quadro FX 380 and GeForce GT 520. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro FX 380 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce GT 520 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro FX 380
Quadro FX 380
NVIDIA GeForce GT 520
GeForce GT 520

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 15 votes

Rate Quadro FX 380 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 745 votes

Rate GeForce GT 520 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.