GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile vs Quadro FX 380 LP

#ad 
Buy
Quadro FX 330 Quadro FX 350 Quadro FX 370 Quadro FX 370 LP Quadro FX 380 Quadro FX 380 LP
VS
#ad 
Buy
GTX 1650 Mobile GTX 1650 Max-Q GTX 1650 Mobile Refresh GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q GTX 1650 Ti Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro FX 380 LP with GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, including specs and performance data.

FX 380 LP
2009
512 MB GDDR3, 28 Watt
0.32

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile outperforms FX 380 LP by a whopping 5353% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
FX 380 LP FX 380 LP
GTX 1650 Ti Mobile GTX 1650 Ti

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1291289
Place by popularitynot in top-10082
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.01no data
Power efficiency0.9127.70
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameGT218TU116
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date1 December 2009 (15 years ago)23 April 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$169 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores161024
Core clock speed550 MHz1350 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1485 MHz
Number of transistors260 million6,600 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)28 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate4.40095.04
Floating-point processing power0.044 TFLOPS3.041 TFLOPS
ROPs432
TMUs864

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length168 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount512 MB4 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth12.8 GB/s192.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x DisplayPortNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model4.16.5
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/A1.2.140
CUDA1.27.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

FX 380 LP 0.32
GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 17.45
+5353%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

FX 380 LP 144
GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 7796
+5314%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD1−2
−5600%
57
+5600%
1440p0−144
4K-0−124

Cost per frame, $

1080p169.00no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 123
+0%
123
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 59
+0%
59
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 57
+0%
57
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 84
+0%
84
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 95
+0%
95
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 46
+0%
46
+0%
Far Cry 5 67
+0%
67
+0%
Fortnite 121
+0%
121
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 78
+0%
78
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 42
+0%
42
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Valorant 181
+0%
181
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 73
+0%
73
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 69
+0%
69
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 36
+0%
36
+0%
Dota 2 119
+0%
119
+0%
Far Cry 5 62
+0%
62
+0%
Fortnite 90
+0%
90
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 67
+0%
67
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 76
+0%
76
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 32
+0%
32
+0%
Metro Exodus 38
+0%
38
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 72
+0%
72
+0%
Valorant 180
+0%
180
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 67
+0%
67
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 34
+0%
34
+0%
Dota 2 112
+0%
112
+0%
Far Cry 5 58
+0%
58
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 22
+0%
22
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 39
+0%
39
+0%
Valorant 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 69
+0%
69
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Metro Exodus 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 164
+0%
164
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 51
+0%
51
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 16
+0%
16
+0%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 41
+0%
41
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 25
+0%
25
+0%
Valorant 84
+0%
84
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 28
+0%
28
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 6
+0%
6
+0%
Dota 2 52
+0%
52
+0%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 13
+0%
13
+0%

This is how FX 380 LP and GTX 1650 Ti Mobile compete in popular games:

  • GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is 5600% faster in 1080p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 66 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 0.32 17.45
Recency 1 December 2009 23 April 2020
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 28 Watt 50 Watt

FX 380 LP has 78.6% lower power consumption.

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, on the other hand, has a 5353.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 233.3% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro FX 380 LP in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro FX 380 LP is a workstation card while GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 LP
Quadro FX 380 LP
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

FX 380 LP Quadro FX 380 LP
vs
FirePro 2270 FirePro 2270
GTX 1650 Ti Mobile GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
vs
Radeon 880M Radeon 880M
FX 380 LP Quadro FX 380 LP
vs
FX 380 Quadro FX 380
Quadro 6000 6000
vs
Tesla M2070 Tesla M2070
Quadro 6000 6000
vs
UHD Graphics 770 UHD Graphics 770
Quadro 4000 4000
vs
K3100M K3100M
Quadro 4000 4000
vs
R7 M445 R7 M445
Quadro 4000 4000
vs
R9 360 OEM R9 360 OEM
NVS 295 NVS 295
vs
ATI 9000 PRO 9000 PRO
FX 580 FX 580
vs
Radeon 610M 610M
Tesla C1060 Tesla C1060
vs
RTX 2080 Ti RTX 2080 Ti
FX 1800 FX 1800
vs
HD 7690M XT HD 7690M XT
FX 3800 FX 3800
vs
GeForce 210 210

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.1 7 votes

Rate Quadro FX 380 LP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 1765 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro FX 380 LP or GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.