Radeon R5 M250 vs Quadro FX 370M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1434not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.85no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code nameG98Jet
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date15 August 2008 (17 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores8320
Core clock speed550 MHz650 MHz
Boost clock speedno data700 MHz
Number of transistors210 million690 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)20 Wattno data
Texture fill rate2.20014.00
Floating-point processing power0.0224 TFLOPS0.448 TFLOPS
ROPs48
TMUs420
L2 Cache16 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceMXM-IIPCIe 3.0 x8

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR3
Maximum RAM amount256 MB1 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed600 MHz1800 MBps
Memory bandwidth9.6 GB/s14.4 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 (11_1)
Shader Model4.06.5 (5.1)
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.12.1 (1.2)
VulkanN/A1.2.170
CUDA1.1-

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 1 GB
Chip lithography 65 nm 28 nm

R5 M250 has a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 132.1% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro FX 370M and Radeon R5 M250. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro FX 370M is a mobile workstation graphics card while Radeon R5 M250 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro FX 370M
Quadro FX 370M
AMD Radeon R5 M250
Radeon R5 M250

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 3 votes

Rate Quadro FX 370M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 4 votes

Rate Radeon R5 M250 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro FX 370M or Radeon R5 M250, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.