Quadro 3000M X2 vs GeForce 9300M GS

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1396not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.66no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Fermi (2010−2014)
GPU code nameG98EXMF104
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date4 June 2008 (17 years ago)22 February 2011 (14 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores8240 ×2
Core clock speed550 MHz450 MHz
Number of transistors210 million1,950 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)13 Watt150 Watt
Texture fill rate4.40018.00 ×2
Floating-point processing power0.0224 TFLOPS0.432 TFLOPS ×2
Gigaflops34no data
ROPs432 ×2
TMUs840 ×2
L1 Cacheno data320 KB
L2 Cache16 KB512 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceMXM-IMXM-B (3.0)
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount256 MB2 GB ×2
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit ×2
Memory clock speed700 MHz625 MHz
Memory bandwidth11.2 GB/s80 GB/s ×2
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 (11_0)
Shader Model4.05.1
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.11.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA+2.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 4 June 2008 22 February 2011
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 2 GB
Chip lithography 65 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 13 Watt 150 Watt

9300M GS has 1053.8% lower power consumption.

3000M X2, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 62.5% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 9300M GS and Quadro 3000M X2. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 9300M GS is a notebook graphics card while Quadro 3000M X2 is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 9300M GS
GeForce 9300M GS
NVIDIA Quadro 3000M X2
Quadro 3000M X2

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 165 votes

Rate GeForce 9300M GS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Quadro 3000M X2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 9300M GS or Quadro 3000M X2, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.