Quadro P3200 vs Quadro FX 370M

Place in the ranking	1366	248
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	0.83	20.98
Architecture	Tesla (2006−2010)	Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code name	G98	GP104
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Mobile workstation
Release date	15 August 2008 (16 years ago)	21 February 2018 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	8	1792
Core clock speed	550 MHz	1328 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1543 MHz
Number of transistors	210 million	7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology	65 nm	16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	20 Watt	75 Watt
Texture fill rate	2.200	172.8
Floating-point processing power	0.0224 TFLOPS	5.53 TFLOPS
ROPs	4	64
TMUs	4	112

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	no data	large
Interface	MXM-II	MXM-B (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR3	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	256 MB	6 GB
Memory bus width	64 Bit	192 Bit
Memory clock speed	600 MHz	1753 MHz
Memory bandwidth	9.6 GB/s	168.3 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11.1 (10_0)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	4.0	6.4
OpenGL	3.3	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	1.2
Vulkan	N/A	1.2.131
CUDA	1.1	6.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX 370M 0.24

Quadro P3200 22.85
+9421%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

FX 370M 93

Quadro P3200 8790
+9352%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	0−1	85
4K	-0−1	28

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

2−3

−1750%

35−40
+1750%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −2067%	65 +2067%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −2250%	45−50 +2250%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −1750%	35−40 +1750%
Hitman 3	4−5 −1050%	45−50 +1050%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 −1238%	100−110 +1238%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	4−5 −3125%	129 +3125%
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30 −254%	95−100 +254%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −2833%	88 +2833%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −2250%	45−50 +2250%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −1750%	35−40 +1750%
Hitman 3	4−5 −1050%	45−50 +1050%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 −1238%	100−110 +1238%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	4−5 −1825%	75−80 +1825%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	9−10 −456%	50−55 +456%
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30 −254%	95−100 +254%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −1233%	40 +1233%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −2250%	45−50 +2250%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −1750%	35−40 +1750%
Hitman 3	4−5 −1050%	45−50 +1050%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 −1238%	100−110 +1238%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	4−5 −1825%	75−80 +1825%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	9−10 −411%	46 +411%
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30 −254%	95−100 +254%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	14−16
Hitman 3	6−7 −350%	27−30 +350%
Horizon Zero Dawn	2−3 −2250%	45−50 +2250%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

2−3

−1800%

35−40
+1800%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 −1300%	14−16 +1300%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	12−14

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

2−3

−900%

20−22
+900%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%
Battlefield 5	75−80 +0%	75−80 +0%
Far Cry 5	50−55 +0%	50−55 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	60−65 +0%	60−65 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	130−140 +0%	130−140 +0%
Metro Exodus	75−80 +0%	75−80 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	60−65 +0%	60−65 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%
Battlefield 5	75−80 +0%	75−80 +0%
Far Cry 5	50−55 +0%	50−55 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	60−65 +0%	60−65 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	130−140 +0%	130−140 +0%
Metro Exodus	75−80 +0%	75−80 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	60−65 +0%	60−65 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%
Far Cry 5	50−55 +0%	50−55 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	72 +0%	72 +0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

60−65

+0%

60−65

+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	21−24 +0%	21−24 +0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%
Far Cry 5	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	130−140 +0%	130−140 +0%
Metro Exodus	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	45−50 +0%	45−50 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	27−30 +0%	27−30 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	130−140 +0%	130−140 +0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	21−24 +0%	21−24 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	18−20 +0%	18−20 +0%
Hitman 3	18−20 +0%	18−20 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	110−120 +0%	110−120 +0%
Metro Exodus	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	28 +0%	28 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	12−14 +0%	12−14 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%
Far Cry 5	12−14 +0%	12−14 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	27−30 +0%	27−30 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	10−11 +0%	10−11 +0%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Shadow of the Tomb Raider, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the Quadro P3200 is 3125% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

Quadro P3200 is ahead in 29 tests (41%)
there's a draw in 41 test (59%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.24	22.85
Recency	15 August 2008	21 February 2018
Maximum RAM amount	256 MB	6 GB
Chip lithography	65 nm	16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	20 Watt	75 Watt

FX 370M has 275% lower power consumption.

Quadro P3200, on the other hand, has a 9420.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, a 2300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 306.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Quadro P3200 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro FX 370M in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.