Arc A380 vs Quadro FX 370M

Place in the ranking	1360	331
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	43.99
Power efficiency	0.84	14.99
Architecture	Tesla (2006−2010)	Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code name	G98	DG2-128
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Desktop
Release date	15 August 2008 (16 years ago)	14 June 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$149

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	8	1024
Core clock speed	550 MHz	2000 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	2050 MHz
Number of transistors	210 million	7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology	65 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	20 Watt	75 Watt
Texture fill rate	2.200	131.2
Floating-point processing power	0.0224 TFLOPS	4.198 TFLOPS
ROPs	4	32
TMUs	4	64
Tensor Cores	no data	128
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	8

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	MXM-II	PCIe 4.0 x8
Length	no data	222 mm
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR3	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	256 MB	6 GB
Memory bus width	64 Bit	96 Bit
Memory clock speed	600 MHz	1937 MHz
Memory bandwidth	9.6 GB/s	186.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0
HDMI	-	+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11.1 (10_0)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	4.0	6.6
OpenGL	3.3	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	3.0
Vulkan	N/A	1.3
CUDA	1.1	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX 370M 0.24

Arc A380 16.11
+6613%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

FX 370M 93

Arc A380 6215
+6583%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

0−1

Cost per frame, $

1080p

no data

3.17

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

2−3
−6400%

130−140

+6400%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −1933%	61 +1933%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −2950%	60−65 +2950%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −6400%	130−140 +6400%
Hitman 3	4−5 −1450%	60−65 +1450%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 −1550%	130−140 +1550%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	4−5 −2475%	100−110 +2475%
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30 −304%	110−120 +304%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −2300%	72 +2300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −2950%	60−65 +2950%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −6400%	130−140 +6400%
Hitman 3	4−5 −1450%	60−65 +1450%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 −1550%	130−140 +1550%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	4−5 −1900%	80 +1900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	9−10 −600%	60−65 +600%
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30 −304%	110−120 +304%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −867%	29 +867%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −2950%	60−65 +2950%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −6400%	130−140 +6400%
Hitman 3	4−5 −1450%	60−65 +1450%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 −550%	52 +550%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	4−5 −1425%	61 +1425%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	9−10 −278%	34 +278%
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30 +12%	25 −12%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	0−1
Hitman 3	6−7 −500%	35−40 +500%
Horizon Zero Dawn	2−3 −3000%	60−65 +3000%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

2−3

−2400%

50−55
+2400%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 −1800%	18−20 +1800%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	16−18

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

2−3

−1200%

24−27
+1200%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	50 +0%	50 +0%
Battlefield 5	95−100 +0%	95−100 +0%
Far Cry 5	65−70 +0%	65−70 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	75−80 +0%	75−80 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	160−170 +0%	160−170 +0%
Metro Exodus	100−110 +0%	100−110 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	75−80 +0%	75−80 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	37 +0%	37 +0%
Battlefield 5	95−100 +0%	95−100 +0%
Far Cry 5	65−70 +0%	65−70 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	75−80 +0%	75−80 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	160−170 +0%	160−170 +0%
Metro Exodus	100−110 +0%	100−110 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	75−80 +0%	75−80 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	31 +0%	31 +0%
Far Cry 5	65−70 +0%	65−70 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	57 +0%	57 +0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

75−80

+0%

75−80

+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	55−60 +0%	55−60 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	45−50 +0%	45−50 +0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
Far Cry 5	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	170−180 +0%	170−180 +0%
Metro Exodus	55−60 +0%	55−60 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	65−70 +0%	65−70 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	160−170 +0%	160−170 +0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	27−30 +0%	27−30 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%
Hitman 3	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	140−150 +0%	140−150 +0%
Metro Exodus	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	18−20 +0%	18−20 +0%
Far Cry 5	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the FX 370M is 12% faster.
in Horizon Zero Dawn, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Arc A380 is 3000% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

FX 370M is ahead in 1 test (2%)
Arc A380 is ahead in 24 tests (37%)
there's a draw in 40 tests (62%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.24	16.11
Recency	15 August 2008	14 June 2022
Maximum RAM amount	256 MB	6 GB
Chip lithography	65 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	20 Watt	75 Watt

FX 370M has 275% lower power consumption.

Arc A380, on the other hand, has a 6612.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 13 years, a 2300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 983.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Arc A380 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro FX 370M in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro FX 370M is a mobile workstation card while Arc A380 is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.