Radeon RX 5300 vs Quadro FX 370

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro FX 370 with Radeon RX 5300, including specs and performance data.

FX 370
2007
256 MB DDR2, 35 Watt
0.20

RX 5300 outperforms FX 370 by a whopping 8955% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1435327
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.4413.80
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)
GPU code nameG84Navi 14
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date12 September 2007 (17 years ago)28 May 2020 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$129 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores161408
Core clock speed360 MHz1327 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1645 MHz
Number of transistors289 million6,400 million
Manufacturing process technology80 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt100 Watt
Texture fill rate2.880144.8
Floating-point processing power0.02304 TFLOPS4.632 TFLOPS
ROPs432
TMUs888
L2 Cache16 KB1536 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Length198 mm180 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount256 MB3 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit96 Bit
Memory clock speed500 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth8 GB/s168.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model4.06.5
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.12.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA1.1-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

FX 370 0.20
RX 5300 18.11
+8955%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

FX 370 Samples: 55 83
RX 5300 Samples: 33 7587
+9041%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.20 18.11
Recency 12 September 2007 28 May 2020
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 3 GB
Chip lithography 80 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 100 Watt

FX 370 has 185.7% lower power consumption.

RX 5300, on the other hand, has a 8955% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, a 1100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1042.9% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 5300 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro FX 370 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro FX 370 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon RX 5300 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro FX 370
Quadro FX 370
AMD Radeon RX 5300
Radeon RX 5300

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1.2 10 votes

Rate Quadro FX 370 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 44 votes

Rate Radeon RX 5300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro FX 370 or Radeon RX 5300, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.