CMP 50HX vs Quadro FX 370 LP

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1417not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.80no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameG98TU102
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date6 November 2008 (17 years ago)24 June 2021 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$129 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores83584
Core clock speed540 MHz1350 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1545 MHz
Number of transistors210 million18,600 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate4.320296.6
Floating-point processing power0.01728 TFLOPS11.07 TFLOPS
ROPs480
TMUs8192
Tensor Coresno data448
Ray Tracing Coresno data56
L1 Cacheno data3.5 MB
L2 Cache16 KB5 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x4
Length198 mm267 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount256 MB10 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit320 Bit
Memory clock speed500 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth8 GB/s560.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DMS-59No outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.06.8
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA1.17.5
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 November 2008 24 June 2021
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 10 GB
Chip lithography 65 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 250 Watt

FX 370 LP has 900% lower power consumption.

CMP 50HX, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 12 years, a 3900% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 441.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro FX 370 LP and CMP 50HX. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 LP
Quadro FX 370 LP
NVIDIA CMP 50HX
CMP 50HX

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 4 votes

Rate Quadro FX 370 LP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 68 votes

Rate CMP 50HX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro FX 370 LP or CMP 50HX, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.