ATI FirePro V9800 vs Quadro FX 370

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1453not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.44no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameG84Cypress
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date12 September 2007 (18 years ago)9 September 2010 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$129 $3,499

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores161600
Core clock speed360 MHz850 MHz
Number of transistors289 million2,154 million
Manufacturing process technology80 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate2.88068.00
Floating-point processing power0.02304 TFLOPS2.72 TFLOPS
ROPs432
TMUs880
L1 Cacheno data160 KB
L2 Cache16 KB512 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length198 mm267 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount256 MB4 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed500 MHz1150 MHz
Memory bandwidth8 GB/s147.2 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI6x mini-DisplayPort, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model4.05.0
OpenGL3.34.4
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA1.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 12 September 2007 9 September 2010
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 80 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 250 Watt

FX 370 has 614.3% lower power consumption.

ATI V9800, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro FX 370 and FirePro V9800. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro FX 370
Quadro FX 370
ATI FirePro V9800
FirePro V9800

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1.2 10 votes

Rate Quadro FX 370 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate FirePro V9800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro FX 370 or FirePro V9800, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.